Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 28
ABBATIELLO v. Italy
ABBATIELLO v. Italy ITA 20/12/2007 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of private life: Limitations of personal capacity in bankruptcy proceedings after the closure of bankruptcy proceedings and impossibility of obtaining EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44521
AMANN v. Switzerland
AMANN v. Switzerland CHE 16/02/2000 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Lack of predictability of the legislation regarding the monitoring of the telephone lines and the storing of intercepted EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4672
BARBULESCU v. Romania
BARBULESCU v. Romania ROU 05/09/2017 00:00:00 20/09/2017 18:11:03 Case Description: Protection of private life and of correspondence: Disproportionate interference due to the monitoring of an employee s use of the Internet at his place of work and use of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47645
CENTRE FOR DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW v. Ukraine
CENTRE FOR DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW v. Ukraine UKR 26/07/2020 00:00:00 21/08/2020 16:51:54 Case Description: The group of cases concerns the disproportionate refusal of the authorities at different periods between 2005 2014 to provide an NGO and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55745
CITARELLA v. Italy
CITARELLA v. Italy ITA 15/04/2008 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:48:54 Case Description: Protection of private and family life electoral rights and effective remedy: Illegitimate restrictions of various rights ordered in the framework of the bankruptcy EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44719
COPPOLA v. Italy
COPPOLA v. Italy ITA 29/04/2013 00:00:00 25/11/2016 11:26:33 Case Description: Protection of private life and effective remedy: Unjustified restrictions to correspondence in bankruptcy proceedings due to the inscription of the applicants on the lists of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-41451
CYPRUS v. Turkey
CYPRUS v. Turkey TUR 10/05/2001 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: The case concerns 14 violations in relation to the situation in the northern part of Cyprus since the military intervention by Turkey in July and August 1974 concerning: Greek EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37128
D AND OTHERS v. Romania
D AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 22/06/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: Lack of a remedy right to life and protection against ill treatment expulsion: Lacking availability of an effective remedy with automatic suspensive effect against an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55611
DE TOMMASO v. Italy
DE TOMMASO v. Italy ITA 23/02/2017 00:00:00 24/03/2017 11:39:16 Case Description: This case concerns the quality of the Italian legislation on imposition of special police supervision orders involving restrictions of various freedoms on persons considered EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46307
EGILL EINARSSON v. Iceland
EGILL EINARSSON v. Iceland ISL 07/02/2018 00:00:00 16/03/2018 17:33:32 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference due to the dismissal of defamation proceedings brought by a public figure for the publication of a picture EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49139
GIORGI NIKOLAISHVILI v. Georgia
GIORGI NIKOLAISHVILI v. Georgia GEO 13/04/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and of private life: Arrest of a witness in order to put pressure on his fugitive brother in the absence of a valid court order EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5816
HALFORD v. the United Kingdom
HALFORD v. the United Kingdom GBR 25/06/1997 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life: Illegal interferences due to the interception of telephone calls made on the applicant s office telephone linked to internal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2362
HATTON AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom
HATTON AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom GBR 08/07/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Lack of an effective remedy: Inability for the applicants to challenge the government policy on night flights at Heathrow airport allegedly interfering EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2548
IHSAN AY v. Turkey
IHSAN AY v. Turkey TUR 21/04/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to the Supreme Administrative Court s failure to adduce an adequate EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37240
JURJEVS v. Latvia
JURJEVS v. Latvia LVA 15/09/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:33:38 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice protection of private life and correspondence: Unfair criminal proceedings due to unlawful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31214
KITANOVSKA STANOJKOVIC AND OTHERS v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
KITANOVSKA STANOJKOVIC AND OTHERS v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 13/01/2017 00:00:00 04/04/2017 11:39:19 Case Description: Right to life: Delayed enforcement of a custodial sentence for an aggravated robbery in which the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46529
LASZLO MAGYAR v. Hungary
LASZLO MAGYAR v. Hungary HUN 13/10/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment on account of the applicants life sentences EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10897
LAVENTS v. Latvia
LAVENTS v. Latvia LVA 28/02/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:33:08 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice protection of private life and correspondence: Unfair criminal proceedings due to unlawful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31170
LIBERTY AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom
LIBERTY AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom GBR 01/10/2008 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unlawful interference due to the insufficient clarity of the Interception of Communications Act 1985 which conferred on the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2662
LINDSTRAND PARTNERS ADVOKATBYRA AB v. Sweden
LINDSTRAND PARTNERS ADVOKATBYRA AB v. Sweden SWE 29/05/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: Lack of an effective remedy in the context of protection of private and family life: Denial of locus standi in proceedings concerning the Tax Agency EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47071