Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 42
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ASSOCIATION FOR SOLIDARITY WITH JEHOVAH WITNESSES AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
ASSOCIATION FOR SOLIDARITY WITH JEHOVAH WITNESSES AND OTHERS v. TURKEY TUR 17/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to freedom of religion on account of the application of urban planning EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39509
BRAHIMAJ v. Albania
BRAHIMAJ v. Albania ALB 06/10/2016 00:00:00 24/10/2016 16:48:47 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice protection of property and lack of an effective remedy: Domestic authorities failure to execute final judicial decisions EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-277
BUDIVELNO INVESTYTSIYNA GRUPA 1 v. Ukraine
BUDIVELNO INVESTYTSIYNA GRUPA 1 v. Ukraine UKR 17/12/2020 00:00:00 18/12/2020 10:22:22 Case Description: This case concerns the excessive burden on the applicant company imposed by the actions of the authorities through the re classification in 2008 of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56505
CENI v. Italy
CENI v. Italy ITA 04/05/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Protection of property: Cancellation of a preliminary contract without transfer of ownership concerning the sale of an off plan flat by the judicial liquidator in bankruptcy EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28238
CORALLO v. the Netherlands
CORALLO v. the Netherlands NLD 09/10/2018 00:00:00 18/10/2018 16:08:29 Case Description: This case concerns the poor conditions of the applicant s detention in the Philipsburg Police Station on Sint Maarten situated in the Caribbean where he was detained EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50579
CROCE AND OTHERS v. Italy
CROCE AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 16/12/2021 00:00:00 16/12/2021 17:16:40 Case Description: This case concerns the expropriation of a private land for the construction of a public road and failure of the national authorities to guarantee the payment of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59101
DI SARNO AND OTHERS v. Italy
DI SARNO AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 10/04/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This case concerns the interference with the applicants right to respect for their private lives and their homes because of the Italian authorities prolonged EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28262
GRIGOLOVIC v. Lithuania
GRIGOLOVIC v. Lithuania LTU 10/01/2018 00:00:00 07/02/2018 16:20:53 Case Description: These cases concern the authorities failure to act with sufficient promptness to restore the applicants property rights to previously nationalised lands Grigolovic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48761
HUMBATOV v. Azerbaijan
HUMBATOV v. Azerbaijan AZE 03/03/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 14:48:21 Case Description: These cases concern the non enforcement of final domestic court decisions violations of Article 6 1 and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 entailing three different kinds of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1898
HUTTEN-CZAPSKA v. Poland
HUTTEN CZAPSKA v. Poland POL 19/06/2006 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:14:57 Case Description: Protection of property: Systemic problem the malfunctioning of national legislation on housing in that: it imposed restrictions on landlords rights and did not provide EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39852
I.D. v. the Republic of Moldova
I.D. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:43:32 Case Description: This group of cases concerns poor material conditions of detention in establishments under the authority of the Ministries of the Interior and Justice and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13946
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary HUN 17/04/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group of cases concerns inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to the applicants poor conditions of detention both pre trial and post conviction resulting EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10809
JAMES v. the United Kingdom
JAMES v. the United Kingdom GBR 11/02/2013 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Arbitrary and unlawful detention of prisoners with indeterminate sentences for public protection IPP : after expiry of tariff periods failure to provide appropriate EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3011
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia RUS 15/10/2002 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service FSIN EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14068
KEHAYOV v. Bulgaria
KEHAYOV v. Bulgaria BGR 18/04/2005 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Most of these cases concern the inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicants in penitentiary facilities between 1996 and 2019 in particular owing to overcrowding poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3589
KHIZANISHVILI AND KANDELAKI v. Georgia
KHIZANISHVILI AND KANDELAKI v. Georgia GEO 17/03/2020 00:00:00 06/04/2020 16:28:10 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the applicants property rights due to the fact that in 2011 the Tbilisi Court of Appeal failed to award them full EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55093
KOSTIC v. Serbia
KOSTIC v. Serbia SRB 25/02/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 14:45:07 Case Description: The majority of these cases concerns violations of the applicants rights to access to a court where: i the authorities since 1996 failed to enforce or enforced with significant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8635
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
M. OZEL AND OTHERS v. Turkey
M. OZEL AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 02/05/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:29:41 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the procedural aspect of the right to life on account of the State s failure to establish responsibility for death of earthquake EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37096