Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 21
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The group of cases Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicants right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans on the holding of gay EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14136
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: The case of Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans over a period of three EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48317
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
BRAGI GUÐMUNDUR KRISTJÁNSSON v. Iceland
BRAGI GU MUNDUR KRISTJ NSSON v. Iceland ISL 30/11/2021 00:00:00 16/12/2021 17:16:40 Case Description: These cases concern the violations of Article 4 of Protocol 7 right not to be tried or punished twice ne bis in idem on the account of the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59201
CEGOLEA v. Romania
CEGOLEA v. Romania ROU 24/07/2020 00:00:00 21/08/2020 16:51:54 Case Description: In Romania the Constitution reserves one seat in the Chamber of Deputies to each national minority whose organisations do not attain the electoral threshold. This case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55723
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/06/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: These cases concern disproportionate and unjustified interferences with the applicants right to respect for their private lives due to the indefinite retention of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55601
GENC AND DEMIRGAN v. Turkey
GENC AND DEMIRGAN v. Turkey TUR 10/10/2017 00:00:00 12/10/2017 16:39:24 Case Description: This group of cases concern the failure of the national authorities to comply with numerous administrative court decisions delivered in favour of the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47927
IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. Georgia
IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. Georgia GEO 12/08/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: These cases concern: degrading treatment of the applicants on account of abusive and humiliating police conduct motivated by homophobic and/or transphobic hatred EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5894
INSANOV v. Azerbaijan
INSANOV v. Azerbaijan AZE 14/06/2013 00:00:00 26/10/2016 11:35:31 Case Description: These two cases concern inhuman and degrading conditions of detention violations of Article 3 . In the Insanov case the applicant a former Minister of Health Care was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1801
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
KHAN v. France
KHAN v. France FRA 28/05/2019 00:00:00 12/06/2019 17:29:15 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment of the applicant a 12 year old unaccompanied minor UM in transit to the United Kingdom resulting from the authorities failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52223
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
LIU v. Russia (no. 2)
LIU v. Russia no. 2 RUS 03/08/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants exclusion on national security grounds from the Russian Federation in different time periods from 2004 to 2015 in violation of their right EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14148
MANOLE AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova
MANOLE AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 17/12/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This case concerns undue interferences with the right of freedom of expression of journalists editors and producers working at the state television EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6752
NISIOTIS v. Greece
NISIOTIS v. Greece GRC 20/06/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: These cases concern the inhuman and/or degrading treatment of the applicants on account of the poor conditions of detention of the applicants in overcrowded prisons in Greece EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15760
PINTAR AND OTHERS v. Slovenia
PINTAR AND OTHERS v. Slovenia SVN 14/12/2021 00:00:00 10/01/2022 09:21:48 Case Description: This case concerns the authorities failure to introduce remedies that would provide the applicants with a reasonable opportunity to challenge the Bank of Slovenia EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59299
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia RUS 12/04/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These five cases all concern shortcomings in the legal framework surrounding secret surveillance carried out in the context of operational search activities: The Roman EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14134
SACALEANU v. Romania
SACALEANU v. Romania ROU 06/12/2005 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 19 judgments in respect of 101 applications 1 relates to the long standing structural problem of non implementation or delayed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12744
STRAIN AND OTHERS v. Romania
STRAIN AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 30/11/2005 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: The violations found in the 16 judgments currently 1 examined in this group originated in structural deficiencies in the mechanisms set up in Romania as of 1990 to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12742
X v. Finland
X v. Finland FIN 19/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the involuntary confinement of the applicant for care in a mental hospital between 17 February 2005 and 27 January 2006 without sufficient safeguards against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5984