Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 81 - 100 of 121
OLEWNIK-CIEPLINSKA AND OLEWNIK v. Poland
OLEWNIK CIEPLINSKA AND OLEWNIK v. Poland POL 05/12/2019 00:00:00 17/12/2019 16:24:16 Case Description: A series of failures by the police and prosecution service in dealing with the kidnapping of the applicants brother/son between 2001 and 2003 when he EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54443
OLLER KAMINSKA v. Poland
OLLER KAMINSKA v. Poland POL 18/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: Failure to act swiftly in the context of Hague Convention proceedings and proceedings concerning enforcement of Irish courts decisions in Poland regarding the return of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49407
PALKA AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic
PALKA AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic CZE 24/06/2022 00:00:00 03/07/2022 22:00:17 Case Description: The domestic courts in the proceedings which ended in 2012 refused to examine proportionality and fairness in respect of the compensation awarded to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60715
PARASCINETI v. Romania
PARASCINETI v. Romania ROU 13/06/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern longstanding structural deficiencies linked to overcrowding and inadequate living conditions treatment and care afforded to patients and severe EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13027
PIAZZI v. Italy
PIAZZI v. Italy ITA 02/02/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure of juvenile courts and social services to make sufficient and adequate efforts to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28276
PIU AND CIRSTENOIU v. Romania
PIU AND CIRSTENOIU v. Romania ROU 17/01/2017 00:00:00 01/02/2017 17:08:50 Case Description: The case concerns the ineffectiveness of criminal investigation carried out between 2012 and 2014 into the death of the first applicant s husband Article 2 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46011
POGHOSYAN v. Armenia
POGHOSYAN v. Armenia ARM 20/03/2012 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:10:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various violations of the applicants right to liberty and security. In particular on account of: unlawful detention of the applicants for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-365
POP v. Romania
POP v. Romania ROU 16/10/2018 00:00:00 18/10/2018 16:08:29 Case Description: This case concerns the ill treatment suffered by the applicant in 2011 whilst he was under the control of the police and the lack of any records regarding his stay at the police EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50563
PRODELALOVA v. the Czech Republic
PRODELALOVA v. the Czech Republic CZE 20/02/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access rights to children: failure to adopt all measures reasonably expected to safeguard the applicant parents right to family life in the context of disputes EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6430
R.D. AND I.M.D. v. Romania
R.D. AND I.M.D. v. Romania ROU 12/10/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: These cases concern longstanding structural deficiencies linked to overcrowding and inadequate living conditions treatment and care afforded to patients and severe EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58659
R.I. AND OTHERS v. Romania
R.I. AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 04/12/2018 00:00:00 11/12/2018 15:45:04 Case Description: Cases: R.I. and Others v. Romania application no. 57077/16 judgment final on 4 December 2018 Olindraru v. Romania application no. 1490/17 judgment final on 19 March EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50931
R.V. AND OTHERS v. Italy
R.V. AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 18/10/2019 00:00:00 18/11/2019 16:25:04 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54201
RIBIC v. Croatia
RIBIC v. Croatia HRV 02/07/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of family life: Failure of authorities to enforce a parent s contact rights with his child. Article 8 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10227
RIZZOTTO v. Italy (no. 2)
RIZZOTTO v. Italy no. 2 ITA 05/12/2019 00:00:00 17/12/2019 16:24:16 Case Description: The case concerns the procedural safeguards aimed at guaranteeing an effective judicial review of the lawfulness of a pre trial detention order for a suspected person EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54441
RODA AND BONFATTI v. Italy
RODA AND BONFATTI v. Italy ITA 26/03/2007 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:22:30 Case Description: Protection of family life: Authorities failure to take the necessary measures to maintain contacts between children and their natural families while the children were EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45030
S.C. ANTARES TRANSPORT S.A. AND S.C. TRANSROBY S.R.L. v. Romania
S.C. ANTARES TRANSPORT S.A. AND S.C. TRANSROBY S.R.L. v. Romania ROU 15/03/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: The case concerns the withdrawal in 2006 without compensation of six licences to operate public transport services on a group of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13113
S.C. SCUT S.A. v. Romania
S.C. SCUT S.A. v. Romania ROU 26/09/2018 00:00:00 10/10/2018 10:41:00 Case Description: The case concerns the imposition in 2009 of mining royalties to a private company dealing with sand extraction which was found to be arbitrary on account of lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50377
SAVATIN v. Romania
SAVATIN v. Romania ROU 13/12/2016 00:00:00 16/12/2016 16:48:18 Case Description: The case concerns the ill treatment suffered by the applicant in 2010 as a result of the conduct of the law enforcement officers substantive violation of Article 3 . Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45757
SAVINY v. Ukraine
SAVINY v. Ukraine UKR 18/03/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection of family life: Unjustified interference due to insufficient evidence or inadequate assessment of evidence for the decision to remove three children from their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31846
SCOZZARI v. Italy
SCOZZARI v. Italy ITA 13/07/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to the placement of the applicants children in State care in a specific community and failure by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43147