Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 13 of 13
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
CENTRUM FOR RATTVISA v. Sweden
CENTRUM FOR RATTVISA v. Sweden SWE 25/05/2021 00:00:00 28/05/2021 14:53:04 Case Description: This case concerns the alleged risk that the applicant foundation s communications had been or would be intercepted and examined by way of signals intelligence as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57667
EERIKAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland
EERIKAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 13/03/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to freedom of expression due to criminal or civil convictions between 2000 and 2011 for invading the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5968
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary HUN 17/04/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group of cases concerns inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to the applicants poor conditions of detention both pre trial and post conviction resulting EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10809
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France FRA 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment suffered by 27 of the applicants due to prison overcrowding and poor conditions of their detention personal space of less EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55363
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia RUS 15/10/2002 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service FSIN EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14068
KHADIJA ISMAYILOVA v. Azerbaijan
KHADIJA ISMAYILOVA v. Azerbaijan AZE 10/04/2019 00:00:00 04/07/2019 17:16:59 Case Description: The application No. 65286/13 concerns violations of the rights of the applicant a renowned investigative journalist to respect for her private life and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52409
LAMBERT v. France
LAMBERT v. France FRA 24/08/1998 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Disproportionate interference due the refusal of the Cour de cassation to allow contestation of the legality of telephone EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32967
MGN LIMITED v. the United Kingdom
MGN LIMITED v. the United Kingdom GBR 18/04/2011 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:16:22 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant publishing company s obligation as a defendant in domestic privacy proceedings it had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2208
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia RUS 12/04/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These five cases all concern shortcomings in the legal framework surrounding secret surveillance carried out in the context of operational search activities: The Roman EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14134
SCIACCA v. Italy
SCIACCA v. Italy ITA 06/06/2005 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:36:16 Case Description: Protection of private life: Publication in a newspaper of photographs of the applicant taken upon arrest in the context of preliminary investigations following their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45050
VASILESCU v. Belgium
VASILESCU v. Belgium BEL 20/04/2015 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: These cases concern the inhuman and degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to the following material conditions of their detention taken as a whole violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1262
X AND Y v. Romania
X AND Y v. Romania ROU 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private live on account of the absence of a clear and foreseeable legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57459