Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 481 - 500 of 708
OZCAN v. Turkey
OZCAN v. Turkey TUR 10/07/2018 00:00:00 27/07/2018 11:43:11 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Non appearance of the applicants before a court in proceedings to challenge the lawfulness of their continued detention length of detention on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49939
OZCELIK v. the Netherlands
OZCELIK v. the Netherlands NLD 28/07/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:03:03 Case Description: Right to liberty and security: Excessive length of the proceedings by which the applicant s appeal against the rejection for his request for release from a Persistent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4371
OZDIL AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova
OZDIL AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 11/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: In the present case the Court found violations of Articles 5 1 and 8 of the Convention on account of the extra legal transfer of all five applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52803
OZMURAT INSAAT ELEKTRIK NAKLIYAT TEMIZLIK SAN. VE TIC. LTD. STI. v. Turkey
OZMURAT INSAAT ELEKTRIK NAKLIYAT TEMIZLIK SAN. VE TIC. LTD. STI. v. Turkey TUR 09/04/2018 00:00:00 28/05/2018 11:38:33 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Domestic courts refusal without any specific reasons of the applicant s request for a hearing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49543
P. AND S. v. Poland
P. AND S. v. Poland POL 30/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20614
PAFITIS AND OTHERS v. Greece
PAFITIS AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 26/02/1998 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of proceedings before administrative courts. Article 6 1 Other violation in some of the cases: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22130
PAKDEMIRLI v. Turkey
PAKDEMIRLI v. Turkey TUR 22/05/2005 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: The cases concern unjustified interference with the applicants right to freedom of expression as a result of civil defamation proceedings Article 49 of the Code of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37218
PAKETOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
PAKETOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 11/01/2023 00:00:00 03/02/2023 17:20:59 Case Description: The case concerned the impossibility for the applicants fifty one Bulgarian nationals of Roma 1 ethnic origin to enjoy their private and family life and their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62534
PANNULLO AND FORTE v. France
PANNULLO AND FORTE v. France FRA 30/01/2002 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to delayed return by the French authorities to parents residing in Italy of the body of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33105
PANTEA v. Romania
PANTEA v. Romania ROU 03/09/2003 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: The case has been closed. You can access the final resolution via the case documents tab . Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: just EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13075
PARASCINETI v. Romania
PARASCINETI v. Romania ROU 13/06/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern longstanding structural deficiencies linked to overcrowding and inadequate living conditions treatment and care afforded to patients and severe EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13027
PASQUINI v. San Marino (no. 2)
PASQUINI v. San Marino no. 2 SMR 08/03/2021 00:00:00 06/04/2021 20:53:01 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to the presumption of innocence. Even though the criminal proceedings against the applicant on charges of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57159
PATRIKOVA v. Bulgaria
PATRIKOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 22/11/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: The case of Patrikova concerns three different violations of Art. 1 of Prot. 1 due to : 1. the unlawful and arbitrary seizure and damage to the applicant s merchandise EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3819
PATUREL v. France
PATUREL v. France FRA 22/03/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Dispropotionate interference due to criminal or civil convictions or findings in proceedings for defamation for condoning or complicity in condoning war EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33189
PECA v. Greece (n° 2)
PECA v. Greece n 2 GRC 10/09/2010 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Disproportionate limitation of the applicant s right of access to the Court of Cassation due to the dismissal of his appeal on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15609
PENDOV v. Bulgaria
PENDOV v. Bulgaria BGR 12/10/2020 00:00:00 04/11/2020 15:26:31 Case Description: Protection of property rights and freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the unnecessary seizure and retention of the applicant s computer server in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56211
PEREIRA CRUZ AND OTHERS v. Portugal
PEREIRA CRUZ AND OTHERS v. Portugal PRT 26/09/2018 00:00:00 10/10/2018 10:41:00 Case Description: The case concerns the conviction of the applicants in the context of a criminal investigation into a pedophile ring. The Lisbon Court sentenced them to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50417
PEREVEDENTSEVY v. Russia
PEREVEDENTSEVY v. Russia RUS 13/10/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This case concerns the failure by the domestic authorities to protect the life of the applicants son suicide during his mandatory military service in 2003 2004 and to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13940
PERRY v. the United Kingdom
PERRY v. the United Kingdom GBR 17/10/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unlawful interference due to the applicant s videotaping without his knowledge by the police for identification purposes in the context EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2722
PETRELLA v. Italy
PETRELLA v. Italy ITA 06/09/2021 00:00:00 23/09/2021 15:54:44 Case Description: The case concerned the length of the preliminary investigations between 2001 and 2007 in the context of criminal proceedings brought on the basis of a complaint by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58411