Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 34
BARLETTA AND FARNETANO v. Italy
BARLETTA AND FARNETANO v. Italy ITA 26/03/2020 00:00:00 27/03/2020 17:50:04 Case Description: The Trapani group of cases formerly part of the Ceteroni group concerns the excessive length of proceedings before the civil courts violations of Article 6 1 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55019
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
BRONIOWSKI v. Poland
BRONIOWSKI v. Poland POL 22/06/2004 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the absence of an effective mechanism to enforce the applicant s right to compensation reaffirmed in the Land EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17801
BUGAJNY AND OTHERS v. Poland
BUGAJNY AND OTHERS v. Poland POL 01/03/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: Violation of the right to the peaceful enjoyment of possessions: refusal of the authorities in 2000 to expropriate the applicants land which was used for roads EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20602
CENI v. Italy
CENI v. Italy ITA 04/05/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Protection of property: Cancellation of a preliminary contract without transfer of ownership concerning the sale of an off plan flat by the judicial liquidator in bankruptcy EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28238
CLEJA AND MIHALCEA v. Romania
CLEJA AND MIHALCEA v. Romania ROU 08/05/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Disproportionate protection of the interests of the tenants to the detriment of the owners due to the rejection by the Supreme Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16247
COPLAND v. the United Kingdom
COPLAND v. the United Kingdom GBR 03/07/2007 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Arbitrary interference due to monitoring of the applicant s telephone e mail and internet usage during the course of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2682
DILEK AND OTHERS v. Turkey
DILEK AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to freedom of association on account of the civil liability imposed on the applicants civil servants employed on fixed term EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37405
HUTTEN-CZAPSKA v. Poland
HUTTEN CZAPSKA v. Poland POL 19/06/2006 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:14:57 Case Description: Protection of property: Systemic problem the malfunctioning of national legislation on housing in that: it imposed restrictions on landlords rights and did not provide EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39852
JURCIC v. Croatia
JURCIC v. Croatia HRV 04/05/2021 00:00:00 21/05/2021 14:55:48 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of property rights: Direct discrimination on the ground of sex with regard to the denial to a woman having undergone in vitro fertilisation of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57631
JURICIC v. Croatia
JURICIC v. Croatia HRV 01/12/2022 00:00:00 05/12/2022 18:05:55 Case Description: This case concerns an unfair trial due to domestic court s failure in civil proceedings between 2009 and 2016 to assess the legal effect of a preliminary real estate purchase EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62028
KHODORKOVSKIY AND LEBEDEV v. Russia (no.2)
KHODORKOVSKIY AND LEBEDEV v. Russia no.2 RUS 14/05/2020 00:00:00 26/05/2020 16:45:54 Case Description: This case concerns the second trial of Yukos former executives on charges of misappropriation or embezzlement of oil and of laundering the unlawfully EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55163
KHURSHID MUSTAFA AND TARZIBACHI v. Sweden
KHURSHID MUSTAFA AND TARZIBACHI v. Sweden SWE 16/03/2009 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:44:38 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate Interference with the right to receive and impart information due to eviction of Swedish nationals of Iraqi EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2172
KOLYADENKO AND OTHERS v. Russia
KOLYADENKO AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 09/07/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case concerns the failure by the State to discharge its positive obligation to protect lives in the context of a large scale flood in the area around the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14122
KONYV-TAR KFT AND OTHERS v. Hungary
KONYV TAR KFT AND OTHERS v. Hungary HUN 18/03/2019 00:00:00 05/04/2019 11:14:01 Case Description: The case concerns the three applicant companies de facto exclusion in 2013 from the school book distribution contracts and the end of their business after EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51883
KOSTIC v. Serbia
KOSTIC v. Serbia SRB 25/02/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 14:45:07 Case Description: The majority of these cases concerns violations of the applicants rights to access to a court where: i the authorities since 1996 failed to enforce or enforced with significant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8635
KRASIMIR YORDANOV v. Bulgaria
KRASIMIR YORDANOV v. Bulgaria BGR 15/05/2007 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Protection of correspondence and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to return to the applicant items seized in the context of a criminal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3787
LINDHEIM AND OTHERS v. Norway
LINDHEIM AND OTHERS v. Norway NOR 22/10/2012 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Protection of property: Failure to strike a fair balance between the interests of the applicant landowners the lessors and the leaseholders the lessees notably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-207
MUSO v. Italy (no. 1)
MUSO v. Italy no. 1 ITA 14/03/2000 00:00:00 15/11/2016 13:59:35 Case Description: The Trapani group of cases formerly part of the Ceteroni group concerns the excessive length of proceedings before the civil courts violations of Article 6 1 and 8 in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38166
NAVALNYY AND OFITSEROV v. Russia
NAVALNYY AND OFITSEROV v. Russia RUS 04/07/2016 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The Navalnyy and Ofitserov case concerns the criminal conviction in 2013 of Mr Aleksey Navalnyy and Mr Petr Ofitserov of organising and facilitating large scale EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13537