Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 201 - 220 of 255
SASO GORGIEV v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
SASO GORGIEV v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 19/07/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: Right to life: Failure of authorities to protect the applicant against a uniformed police reservist who on unauthorised leave of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6660
SAVOTCHKO v. the Republic of Moldova
SAVOTCHKO v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 28/06/2017 00:00:00 12/07/2017 17:01:36 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Interference due to the disclosure of the applicant s telephone records provided by the national landline EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47385
SCHEMKAMPER v. France
SCHEMKAMPER v. France FRA 18/01/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Lack of an effective remedy: Inability of a convict to challenge a decision of the judge responsible for the execution of sentences who rejected his request for temporary EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33247
SENIGO LONGUE AND OTHERS v. France
SENIGO LONGUE AND OTHERS v. France FRA 10/10/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:01:18 Case Description: Protection of family life: Delays and lack of transparency in family reunification proceedings and failure to give due consideration to the applicants who EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28457
SERGEY VOLOSYUK v. Ukraine
SERGEY VOLOSYUK v. Ukraine UKR 12/06/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: These cases concern the unlawful interference with the applicants right to respect for their correspondence with various official bodies and institutions both while EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31112
SHANNON v. Latvia
SHANNON v. Latvia LVA 24/02/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:33:08 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure by a regional court to examine promptly appeals against the extension of remand in custody. Status of Execution: The applicant was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31183
SHCHOKIN v. Ukraine
SHCHOKIN v. Ukraine UKR 03/01/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns the death of the applicant s son in a penitentiary colony in October 2000 his ill treatment before his death by co prisoners and probably by a prison guard EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31359
SHESTI MAI ENGINEERING OOD AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
SHESTI MAI ENGINEERING OOD AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 20/12/2011 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Violation of the applicants right to property Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 due to an interference with their shareholding in a limited liability EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3857
SHMORGUNOV AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
SHMORGUNOV AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 21/04/2021 00:00:00 11/05/2021 15:56:40 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns multiple violations during the Maidan protests in Kyiv and other cities in Ukraine in 2013 2014 either by State or by non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57585
SHOPOV v. Bulgaria
SHOPOV v. Bulgaria BGR 02/12/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:30:33 Case Description: Unlawful committal to a psychiatric hospital and continuing interference with private life resulting from compulsory psychiatric treatment in outpatient clinic for more than EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4600
SIMKUS v. Lithuania
SIMKUS v. Lithuania LTU 13/09/2017 00:00:00 27/09/2017 10:04:06 Case Description: Ne bis in idem: Duplication of administrative and criminal proceedings for an altercation with police officers after a border control procedure. Article 4 1 of Protocol No. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47725
SINISTAJ AND OTHERS v. Montenegro
SINISTAJ AND OTHERS v. Montenegro MNE 02/05/2016 00:00:00 26/10/2016 21:11:40 Case Description: This case of Sini taj concerns the applicant s ill treatment between 9 and 15 September 2006 in police detention violation of Article 3 in substantive limb . EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3129
SIZAREV v. Ukraine
SIZAREV v. Ukraine UKR 17/04/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure to ensure the applicant s safety in detention in the Yevpatoriya Temporary Detention Facility ITT administered by the police in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31128
SOARE AND OTHERS v. Romania
SOARE AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 22/05/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern deaths life threatening injuries or ill treatment during arrest and other law enforcement operations. The facts occurred between 2000 and 2009. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12812
SOBIESKI-CAMERZAN v. the Republic of Moldova
SOBIESKI CAMERZAN v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 13/02/2018 00:00:00 16/02/2018 14:47:48 Case Description: Protection of private life and home and lack of effective remedy / protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to unlawful seizure by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48927
SOVTRANSAVTO HOLDING v. Ukraine
SOVTRANSAVTO HOLDING v. Ukraine UKR 06/11/2002 00:00:00 07/11/2016 13:25:41 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Breach of the principle of legal certainty due to the objection protest procedure EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-25689
STANIMIROVIC v. Serbia
STANIMIROVIC v. Serbia SRB 08/03/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the ineffective investigations into the allegations of ill treatment by police officers procedural violations of Article 3 ill treatment by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7310
STATILEO v. Croatia
STATILEO v. Croatia HRV 10/10/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 15:28:29 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to the peaceful enjoyment of their property between 1997 and 2015 on account of statutory limitations on the use of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12093
STEBNITSKIY AND KOMFORT v. Ukraine
STEBNITSKIY AND KOMFORT v. Ukraine UKR 03/05/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Protection of property and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful interference due to a court decision concerning the applicant company s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31084
STOICHKOV v. Bulgaria
STOICHKOV v. Bulgaria BGR 24/06/2005 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of judicial review of the lawfulness of the applicants detentions after conviction allowing to address their allegations that the execution of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3805