Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 121 - 140 of 255
KOLYADENKO AND OTHERS v. Russia
KOLYADENKO AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 09/07/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case concerns the failure by the State to discharge its positive obligation to protect lives in the context of a large scale flood in the area around the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14122
KOROBOV AND OTHERS v. Estonia
KOROBOV AND OTHERS v. Estonia EST 28/06/2013 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:41:35 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Ill treatment due to the excessive use of force by law enforcement officers and lack of an effective and independent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37428
KOSTIC v. Serbia
KOSTIC v. Serbia SRB 25/02/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 14:45:07 Case Description: The majority of these cases concerns violations of the applicants rights to access to a court where: i the authorities since 1996 failed to enforce or enforced with significant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8635
KOTILAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland
KOTILAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 17/12/2020 00:00:00 12/01/2021 13:34:45 Case Description: Right to life: Lack of police compliance with their duty of diligence on account of their failure to preventively confiscate a gun from a student whose internet EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56529
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 15/02/2013 00:00:00 16/03/2021 17:52:31 Case Description: These cases concern various irregularities in searches and seizure of property by law enforcement authorities violations of Article 8 and/or Article 1 of Protocol EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31608
KRAULAIDIS v. Lithuania
KRAULAIDIS v. Lithuania LTU 08/02/2017 00:00:00 09/03/2017 11:52:36 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Ineffectiveness of the pre trial investigation into the circumstances of a traffic accident which had left the applicant disabled of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46129
KUCHERUK v. Ukraine
KUCHERUK v. Ukraine UKR 06/12/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns a number of substantial and procedural violations of the applicant s rights under Article 3 while detained on remand at the Kharkiv Regional Pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31583
KUCHTA AND METEL v. Poland
KUCHTA AND METEL v. Poland POL 02/12/2021 00:00:00 16/12/2021 17:16:40 Case Description: This case concerns the excessive use of force by the Police during the applicants arrest in February 2015 and ineffective investigation in the circumstances of this EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59191
KUKLIK v. the Czech Republic
KUKLIK v. the Czech Republic CZE 04/10/2018 00:00:00 10/10/2018 10:41:00 Case Description: Protection of property: Lack of a legal basis for domestic regulation of rent control due to a temporary legal vacuum. Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50409
KUROCHENKO AND ZOLOTUKHIN v. Ukraine
KUROCHENKO AND ZOLOTUKHIN v. Ukraine UKR 11/02/2021 00:00:00 15/03/2021 16:05:41 Case Description: The case concerns the failure of the authorities to take all steps available to them to advance the examination of criminal proceedings pending against the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56939
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
LABERGERE v. France
LABERGERE v. France FRA 26/12/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:51:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the Cassation Court s excessive formalism declaring the applicant s appeal on points of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31517
LANIAUSKAS v. Lithuania
LANIAUSKAS v. Lithuania LTU 17/05/2022 00:00:00 20/05/2022 13:17:17 Case Description: This case concerns the ill treatment inflicted by prison officers on the applicant during a prison riot in 2016 violation of Article 3 . Status of Execution: An action EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60329
LARKOS v. Cyprus
LARKOS v. Cyprus CYP 18/02/1999 00:00:00 26/10/2016 17:40:39 Case Description: Discrimination with regard to protection of private life and home: Unlawful discriminatory treatment of a government tenant living in an area regulated by the Rent Control Law EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1966
LASHMANKIN AND OTHERS v. Russia
LASHMANKIN AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 29/05/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: The Lashmankin group mainly concerns violations of the right to freedom of assembly in different Russian cities between 2003 and 2018 violations of Article 11 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47097
LIBLIK AND OTHERS v. Estonia
LIBLIK AND OTHERS v. Estonia EST 07/10/2019 00:00:00 23/10/2019 11:45:51 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Unlawful interference due to the lack of sufficient reasoning of the preliminary investigation judges and prosecutors EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54071
LOGVINENKO v. Ukraine
LOGVINENKO v. Ukraine UKR 14/01/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: The Logvinenko and Isayev groups of cases concern the inadequacy of medical care in general and for infectious diseases drug addiction and physical disability in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31240
LOIZIDOU v. Turkey
LOIZIDOU v. Turkey TUR 26/08/1993 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:29:41 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Continuous denial of access to and interference with property rights in the northern part of Cyprus and the consequent loss of control thereof. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37072
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine UKR 19/11/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The applicant was at the relevant time an opposition politician who was subject to pre trial detention in 2010 which the Court found to have been imposed for ulterior EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32285
M.A. AND OTHERS v. Lithuania
M.A. AND OTHERS v. Lithuania LTU 11/03/2019 00:00:00 03/04/2019 16:35:04 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of the State Border Guard Service to allow the applicants to submit asylum applications at border check points and their return to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51869