Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 107
A.D.T. v. the United Kingdom
A.D.T. v. the United Kingdom GBR 31/10/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private: Prohibition by law of homosexual acts between several consenting men in private and conviction of the applicant for gross indecency in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2540
A.P., M.P. AND T.P. v. Switzerland
A.P. M.P. AND T.P. v. Switzerland CHE 29/08/1997 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Infringement of the presumption of innocence as the applicants had as heirs been convicted of a tax offence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4634
ABDULKADIR DEMIR v. Turkey
ABDULKADIR DEMIR v. Turkey TUR 09/10/2012 00:00:00 09/11/2016 15:45:01 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions mostly delivered against entities owned or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-35375
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania LTU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 03/12/2018 15:46:42 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights on account of the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50865
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly violations resulting from or relating to the actions of Russian security forces during anti terrorist operations in the Northern Caucasus EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14124
AKYOL AND OTHERS v. Turkey
AKYOL AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 26/05/2020 00:00:00 26/05/2020 16:45:54 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interference on account of disciplinary punishments eleven days of solitary confinement imposed under the Regulations on the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55167
ALI v. Romania
ALI v. Romania ROU 09/02/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 12:37:00 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Overcrowding and poor material conditions in prison and police detention facilities and other EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14169
ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. Turkey
ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: The Alparslan Altan group of cases concerns violations of the right to liberty and security in the immediate aftermath of the coup attempt on 15 July 2016 due to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52779
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia RUS 09/12/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These two cases concern the blanket ban on voting rights imposed automatically pursuant to Article 32 3 of the Constitution on all convicted offenders deprived of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14110
ANGELOVA AND ILIEV v. Bulgaria
ANGELOVA AND ILIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 26/10/2007 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Right to life and protection against ill treatment: Lack of effective investigations into deaths rapes or alleged ill treatment perpetrated by private EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3793
ANTIA AND KHUPENIA v. Georgia
ANTIA AND KHUPENIA v. Georgia GEO 18/09/2020 00:00:00 29/09/2020 17:20:46 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of Article 7 due to the applicants 2006 conviction for neglect of official duties as inspectors of the Unified State Social Insurance EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55939
ARAPOVIC v. Slovenia
ARAPOVIC v. Slovenia SVN 29/10/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:49 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment in detention conditions of detention: Degrading treatment on the account of the poor conditions of detention in Ljubljana Prison and lack EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7332
AYCAGUER v. France
AYCAGUER v. France FRA 22/09/2017 00:00:00 03/10/2017 09:13:29 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference with regard to the applicant s refusal in the context of a criminal sanction to comply with the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47815
AYMELEK v. Turkey
AYMELEK v. Turkey TUR 30/01/2018 00:00:00 13/02/2018 17:06:02 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair trial due to the presence of a military officer appointed by hierarchical superiors and without constitutional EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48809
BASENKO v. Ukraine
BASENKO v. Ukraine UKR 26/02/2016 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and effective remedy: Ill treatment of the applicants by State agents a public transport employee and two volunteer citizen guards and lack EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32270
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania LTU 14/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 16:56:20 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of the law enforcement agencies due to their discriminatory attitudes to launch an investigation into the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55375
BELOZOROV v. Russia
BELOZOROV v. Russia RUS 15/01/2016 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern different violations linked to the unlawful transfer of individuals from Ukraine to the Russian Federation. In both cases the European Court found a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55229
BELOZOROV v. Ukraine
BELOZOROV v. Ukraine UKR 15/01/2016 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern different violations linked to the unlawful transfer of individuals from Ukraine to the Russian Federation. In both cases the European Court found a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14094
BERGENS TIDENDE & OTHERS v. Norway
BERGENS TIDENDE OTHERS v. Norway NOR 02/08/2000 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper and its two editors being convicted in civil defamation proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-177