Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 139
A.D.T. v. the United Kingdom
A.D.T. v. the United Kingdom GBR 31/10/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private: Prohibition by law of homosexual acts between several consenting men in private and conviction of the applicant for gross indecency in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2540
ABDELALI v. France
ABDELALI v. France FRA 11/01/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:01:18 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Refusal to allow a person convicted in absentia to raise a plea of nullity on the ground that he was absconding when the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28450
ABDULKADIR DEMIR v. Turkey
ABDULKADIR DEMIR v. Turkey TUR 09/10/2012 00:00:00 09/11/2016 15:45:01 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions mostly delivered against entities owned or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-35375
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania LTU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 03/12/2018 15:46:42 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights on account of the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50865
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly violations resulting from or relating to the actions of Russian security forces during anti terrorist operations in the Northern Caucasus EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14124
AKYOL AND OTHERS v. Turkey
AKYOL AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 26/05/2020 00:00:00 26/05/2020 16:45:54 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interference on account of disciplinary punishments eleven days of solitary confinement imposed under the Regulations on the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55167
AMER v. Turkey
AMER v. Turkey TUR 06/07/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: Excessive length of criminal proceedings from 29 May 2001 2 March 2006 four years and 9 months for two levels of jurisdiction violation of Article 6 1 and infringement of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37140
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia RUS 09/12/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These two cases concern the blanket ban on voting rights imposed automatically pursuant to Article 32 3 of the Constitution on all convicted offenders deprived of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14110
ANGELOVA AND ILIEV v. Bulgaria
ANGELOVA AND ILIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 26/10/2007 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Right to life and protection against ill treatment: Lack of effective investigations into deaths rapes or alleged ill treatment perpetrated by private EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3793
ANTIA AND KHUPENIA v. Georgia
ANTIA AND KHUPENIA v. Georgia GEO 18/09/2020 00:00:00 29/09/2020 17:20:46 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of Article 7 due to the applicants 2006 conviction for neglect of official duties as inspectors of the Unified State Social Insurance EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55939
AVANESYAN v. Armenia
AVANESYAN v. Armenia ARM 20/10/2021 00:00:00 19/11/2021 15:34:10 Case Description: This case concerns the applicant s refusal to perform military service in 2014 because as a Jehovah s Witness his conscience did not allow him to serve in the army. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58877
AYCAGUER v. France
AYCAGUER v. France FRA 22/09/2017 00:00:00 03/10/2017 09:13:29 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference with regard to the applicant s refusal in the context of a criminal sanction to comply with the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47815
AYMELEK v. Turkey
AYMELEK v. Turkey TUR 30/01/2018 00:00:00 13/02/2018 17:06:02 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair trial due to the presence of a military officer appointed by hierarchical superiors and without constitutional EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48809
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BARATTA v. Italy
BARATTA v. Italy ITA 13/01/2016 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Arbitrary detention as a result of criminal proceedings in absentia leading to life imprisonment of the accused in which he had been declared EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28272
BASENKO v. Ukraine
BASENKO v. Ukraine UKR 26/02/2016 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and effective remedy: Ill treatment of the applicants by State agents a public transport employee and two volunteer citizen guards and lack EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32270
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 03/09/2004 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of judgments 1 concerns the ineffectiveness of investigations criminal prosecutions and disciplinary proceedings in relation to killing torture ill EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37206
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania LTU 14/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 16:56:20 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of the law enforcement agencies due to their discriminatory attitudes to launch an investigation into the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55375
BERGENS TIDENDE & OTHERS v. Norway
BERGENS TIDENDE OTHERS v. Norway NOR 02/08/2000 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper and its two editors being convicted in civil defamation proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-177