Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 201 - 220 of 275
OVIDIU CRISTIAN STOICA v. Romania
OVIDIU CRISTIAN STOICA v. Romania ROU 24/07/2018 00:00:00 10/08/2018 09:42:24 Case Description: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the applicant s conviction by an appeal court in 2012 without a renewed hearing of the witnesses and on the basis of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50085
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey TUR 05/03/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: This group concerns violations of the right to freedom of peaceful assembly including the prosecution of participants and/or the use of excessive force to disperse peaceful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37415
PAIXAO MOREIRA SA FERNANDES v. Portugal
PAIXAO MOREIRA SA FERNANDES v. Portugal PRT 28/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings as the court of appeal which had convicted the applicant for the first time at second instance had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55361
PANASENKO v. Portugal
PANASENKO v. Portugal PRT 22/07/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the ineffectiveness of the court appointed defence counsel preventing the accused from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9645
PARFENTYEV v. Russia
PARFENTYEV v. Russia RUS 11/03/2020 00:00:00 12/11/2020 14:39:13 Case Description: Violation of the applicant s right to private life on account of failure to consider interference in the applicant s private life by an article. An article was about a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56255
PATALAKH v. Germany
PATALAKH v. Germany DEU 08/06/2018 00:00:00 29/06/2018 15:03:37 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Lack of a speedy review of the applicant s detention on remand. Article 5 4 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49807
PATUREL v. France
PATUREL v. France FRA 22/03/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Dispropotionate interference due to criminal or civil convictions or findings in proceedings for defamation for condoning or complicity in condoning war EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33189
PIROGLU & KARAKAYA v. Turkey
PIROGLU KARAKAYA v. Turkey TUR 18/06/2008 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice freedom of association and freedom of expression: Unfairness of criminal proceedings due to the failure to hold an oral EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5594
POP AND OTHERS v. Romania
POP AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 24/06/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of independence and impartiality of the military courts which convicted civilians for trafficking in visa. Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17580
POROPAT v. Slovenia
POROPAT v. Slovenia SVN 09/08/2017 00:00:00 05/09/2017 11:50:38 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial a fair trial on account of the courts refusal to admit evidence the applicant had wished to adduce in criminal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47585
RABCZEWSKA v. Poland
RABCZEWSKA v. Poland POL 30/01/2023 00:00:00 13/02/2023 14:31:45 Case Description: The applicant popular pop singer was convicted by domestic court in 2012 to a fine for offending religious feelings of others through publicly insulting the Bible without EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62557
RADAJ v. Poland
RADAJ v. Poland POL 28/02/2003 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Interception and opening of the letters of a person detained on remand addressed to the European Commission of Human Rights. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17729
RAMISHVILI v. Georgia
RAMISHVILI v. Georgia GEO 31/05/2018 00:00:00 15/06/2018 15:30:46 Case Description: Electoral rights: General and automatic ban in the parliamentary elections 2008 on all prisoners convicted of a crime irrespective of the length of the sentence and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49609
RODIC AND OTHERS v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
RODIC AND OTHERS v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 01/12/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:13:46 Case Description: Conditions of detention: Failure of the authorities to protect prisoners convicted for war crimes from ethnically motivated persecution by their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4149
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia RUS 12/04/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These five cases all concern shortcomings in the legal framework surrounding secret surveillance carried out in the context of operational search activities: The Roman EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14134
RRAPO v. Albania
RRAPO v. Albania ALB 25/12/2012 00:00:00 24/10/2016 17:59:35 Case Description: Co operation with the ECHR and right of individual petition: Failure of the authorities to abide by the ECHR s Order under the rule 39 of the Rules of Court requesting not to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-347
RUDNICHENKO v. Ukraine
RUDNICHENKO v. Ukraine UKR 11/10/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 13:48:08 Case Description: Right to liberty functioning of justice: Unlawful administrative detention without a court order and excessively lengthy detention on remand unfair criminal proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33465
RUPA AND TOMPI v. Romania
RUPA AND TOMPI v. Romania ROU 02/05/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:45:10 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to provide pertinent and sufficient reasons to justify extending the 15 years old first applicant s pre trial detention. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46753
SALAKHOV AND ISLYAMOVA v. Ukraine
SALAKHOV AND ISLYAMOVA v. Ukraine UKR 14/06/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of adequate medical assistance to the first applicant in pre trial detention found primarily due to the Government s failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32272
SAMOILA AND CIONCA v. Romania
SAMOILA AND CIONCA v. Romania ROU 04/06/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to bring arrested applicants promptly before the judge refusal of competent court to review the lawfulness of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16653