Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 261 - 280 of 563
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine UKR 03/12/2020 00:00:00 15/12/2020 14:13:50 Case Description: This group of cases 1 concerns principally the authorities failure to ensure that the applicants can enjoy their homes free from harassment and violent disturbance violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56503
LEVINTA v. the Republic of Moldova
LEVINTA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 16/03/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of cases concerns mainly inhuman treatment or torture in police custody including with a view to extracting confessions lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7162
LIIVIK v. Estonia
LIIVIK v. Estonia EST 25/09/2009 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:56:21 Case Description: No punishment without law: Conviction based on imprecise legislation which did not allow the applicant reasonably to foresee that his acts would be deemed to amount to causing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3087
LISOVSKIJ v. Lithuania
LISOVSKIJ v. Lithuania LTU 02/08/2017 00:00:00 01/09/2017 16:40:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unjustified and excessively lengthy detention on remand as the authorities did not display requisite diligence in the conduct of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47581
LOBANOV v. Russia
LOBANOV v. Russia RUS 16/01/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Unlawful detention of the applicant who was serving his sentence in Russia following his conviction in Kazakhstan due to the delay in his release following the quashing of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13755
LOBZHANIDZE AND PERADZE v. Georgia
LOBZHANIDZE AND PERADZE v. Georgia GEO 07/09/2020 00:00:00 23/09/2020 10:56:42 Case Description: The case concerns the violation of the one of the applicant s right to a fair trial due to the circumstances in which a legal aid lawyer was appointed and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55899
LOPES GOMES DA SILVA v. Portugal
LOPES GOMES DA SILVA v. Portugal PRT 28/12/2000 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant s conviction for defamation following the publication of an editorial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9425
LOREFICE v. Italy
LOREFICE v. Italy ITA 29/09/2017 00:00:00 12/10/2017 16:39:24 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings on the ground that the applicant s initial acquittal was overturned on appeal without further hearing of the prosecution EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47949
LOUCAIDES v. Cyprus
LOUCAIDES v. Cyprus CYP 06/03/2023 00:00:00 20/03/2023 09:18:50 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to a fair trial as the domestic courts failed to duly consider crucial issues concerning a nolle prosequi a direction EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62875
LUCA v. Italy
LUCA v. Italy ITA 27/05/2001 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings resulting in the applicant s conviction based exclusively on pre trial statements made by the co EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-42757
LUCIC v. Croatia
LUCIC v. Croatia HRV 27/05/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Inability for the applicants to examine key witnesses whose statements were of decisive importance for their convictions in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10301
LUCKY DEV v. Sweden
LUCKY DEV v. Sweden SWE 27/02/2015 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:44:38 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Conviction in tax proceedings despite an acquittal in criminal proceedings for the same offence. Status of Execution: The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2194
LUNGU v. Romania
LUNGU v. Romania ROU 08/12/2020 00:00:00 10/12/2020 21:35:28 Case Description: The case concerns the lack of access to an efficient functioning of justice due to the impossibility to examine in court during criminal proceedings an witness for the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56415
LYASHKO v. Ukraine
LYASHKO v. Ukraine UKR 10/11/2006 00:00:00 07/11/2016 14:16:38 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s conviction for publishing four articles criticising certain state officials. Article 10 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26174
M.A. v. France
M.A. v. France FRA 02/07/2018 00:00:00 07/08/2018 10:05:42 Case Description: The M.A. case concerns the enforcement on 20 February 2015 of a removal order against the applicant an Algerian national who was sentenced in 2006 in France to seven years EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50021
M.A. v. the United Kingdom
M.A. v. the United Kingdom GBR 23/09/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Alleged interference due to a deportation order made against the applicant. A friendly settlement was reached on the basis of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58755
M.D. AND OTHERS v. Malta
M.D. AND OTHERS v. Malta MLT 17/10/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:13:19 Case Description: Disproportionate forfeiture of parental rights: lack of access to a court to contest following a change in circumstances a final care order issued by the Juvenile Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4119
M. G. C. v. Romania
M. G. C. v. Romania ROU 15/06/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Judgments: M.G.C. v. Romania No. 61495/11 final on 15/06/2016 I.C. v. Romania No. 36934/08 final on 24/08/2016 These cases concern breaches of the State s positive EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13219
M.M. v. the United Kingdom
M.M. v. the United Kingdom GBR 23/09/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Alleged interference with the applicant s and his wife s and children s family life on account of a decision by the Secretary EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58753
M.P. v. Finland
M.P. v. Finland FIN 15/03/2017 00:00:00 31/03/2017 16:56:44 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unnecessary interference due to the conviction of defamation for voicing concerns in a confidential conversation with a social worker about the possible EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46477