Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 81 - 100 of 277
HANSEN v. Turkey
HANSEN v. Turkey TUR 23/12/2003 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Protection of family life: Failure by authorities to take necessary and adequate measures to enforce court decisions granting the applicant an Icelandic national visiting EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5502
HARABIN v. Slovakia
HARABIN v. Slovakia SVK 20/02/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:46:05 Case Description: Breach of the applicant s right to a fair hearing by an impartial tribunal in disciplinary proceedings before the Constitutional Court in 2011 which related to his role as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7729
HORVATH AND KISS v. Hungary
HORVATH AND KISS v. Hungary HUN 29/04/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: The case concerns discrimination against the applicants born in 1994 and 1992 respectively who are of Roma 1 origin on account of their placement in a special school EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10905
HUSAYN (ABU ZUBAYDAH) v. Poland
HUSAYN ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:10:55 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20584
HUSSAIN v. the United Kingdom
HUSSAIN v. the United Kingdom GBR 07/06/2006 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the presumption of innocence due to the judge s refusal to grant the applicant a defendant s costs order EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3025
I AVGI PUBLISHING AND PRESS AGENCY S.A. & KARIS v. Greece
I AVGI PUBLISHING AND PRESS AGENCY S.A. KARIS v. Greece GRC 05/09/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 15:38:44 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of civil courts convictions of journalists for defamation or insult of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15090
I.D. v. the Republic of Moldova
I.D. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:43:32 Case Description: This group of cases concerns poor material conditions of detention in establishments under the authority of the Ministries of the Interior and Justice and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13946
I.G.D. v. Bulgaria
I.G.D. v. Bulgaria BGR 07/09/2022 00:00:00 19/09/2022 09:34:09 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of direct access to automatic and periodical judicial review concerning the placement of the applicant an endangered minor in closed boarding EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61055
I.G. v. the Republic of Moldova
I.G. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 15/08/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the State s positive obligations under Article 3 because the investigations into the applicants cases fell short of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6880
ŽIBRAT v. Croatia
IBRAT v. Croatia HRV 14/10/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: Functioning of justice and protection of property rights: Delayed enforcement of a final court decision awarding the applicant a house he had bought at a public auction in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58681
IDALOV v. Russia
IDALOV v. Russia RUS 22/05/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case concerns the violation of the applicant s right to a fair trial by a Moscow court in 2003 through his removal from the courtroom for almost the entire length of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13719
ILIAS AND AHMED v. Hungary
ILIAS AND AHMED v. Hungary HUN 21/11/2019 00:00:00 28/11/2019 17:12:23 Case Description: The case of Ilias and Ahmed concerns the authorities failure to comply with their procedural obligation under Article 3 to assess the risks of ill treatment before EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54279
INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR COMMERCE AND DEVELOPMENT AD AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR COMMERCE AND DEVELOPMENT AD AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 17/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the right of the applicant bank to peaceful enjoyment of its possessions on account EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39457
ISAAK v. Turkey
ISAAK v. Turkey TUR 24/09/2008 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: The Kakoulli group concerns the killings of two Greek Cypriot men in 1996 due to excessive use of firearms by Turkish or Turkish Cypriot military security forces along the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37298
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary HUN 17/04/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group of cases concerns inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to the applicants poor conditions of detention both pre trial and post conviction resulting EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10809
IZZETTIN DOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
IZZETTIN DOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 26/04/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:16:29 Case Description: This group concerns the failure within the Turkish legal framework to grant legal recognition to the Alevi faith 1 thus depriving its followers of the right EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37402
JAKUB v. Slovakia
JAKUB v. Slovakia SVK 28/05/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings some of them concerning disputes which should have been resolved with special diligence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8101
JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES OF MOSCOW AND OTHERS v. Russia
JEHOVAH S WITNESSES OF MOSCOW AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 22/11/2010 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:53:14 Case Description: This group of cases Taganrog LRO concerns violation of various rights of the Jehovah s Witnesses. The case of Taganrog LRO concerns violation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22998
JOANNOU v. Turkey
JOANNOU v. Turkey TUR 12/03/2018 00:00:00 04/04/2018 15:18:40 Case Description: The European Court found that in this particular case the Immovable Property Commission set up in 2005 did not act with coherence diligence and appropriate expedition EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49213
K. v. the Netherlands
K. v. the Netherlands NLD 27/11/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of private life: Taking and storing of the applicant s cellular material after he had been convicted of a criminal offence pursuant to the DNA Testing Convicted EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4581