Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 2841 - 2860 of 3584
SARGSYAN v. Azerbaijan
SARGSYAN v. Azerbaijan AZE 16/06/2015 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: The case concerns a refugee of Armenian origin who was forced to flee from his home during the active military phase of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict 1992 94 . In EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1717
SARICA AND DILAVER v. Turkey
SARICA AND DILAVER v. Turkey TUR 04/10/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:27:27 Case Description: Sarica and Dilaver Kahyaoglu 37203/05 and Halil Gocmen 24883/07 cases mainly concern a violation of the right to property on account of de facto expropriation of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37066
SARIDAS v. Turkey
SARIDAS v. Turkey TUR 07/10/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:16:29 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings before the Supreme Military Administrative Court to challenge a medical assessment concerning the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37400
SARISHVILI-BOLKVADZE v. Georgia
SARISHVILI BOLKVADZE v. Georgia GEO 19/10/2018 00:00:00 07/12/2018 12:05:13 Case Description: This case concerns the authorities failure to fulfill their positive obligation to protect the life of the applicant s son from medical negligence after an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50723
SARL ABORCAS v. France
SARL ABORCAS v. France FRA 30/08/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:13:01 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Erroneous refusal of access to a court by the Court of Appeal and the Court of Cassation. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32717
SARL DU PARC D'ACTIVITES DE BLOTZHEIM v. France
SARL DU PARC D ACTIVITES DE BLOTZHEIM v. France FRA 11/10/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:13:01 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial due to the presence of the Government Commissioner in the deliberations of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32851
SARNELLI v. Italy
SARNELLI v. Italy ITA 17/10/2008 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of property and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to inadequate compensation awarded for the expropriation of land EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44550
SATIK v. Turkey (no 2)
SATIK v. Turkey no 2 TUR 08/10/2008 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:41:27 Case Description: Freedom of expression and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s conviction for expressing non violent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36778
SATKA AND OTHERS v. Greece
SATKA AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 27/06/2003 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: Violation of Art. 1 of Protocol No 1 of the Convention on account of blocking the use of the land of the applicants by virtue of successive pieces of legislation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15573
SAVA v. Romania
SAVA v. Romania ROU 16/03/2021 00:00:00 06/04/2021 20:53:01 Case Description: This case concerns an interference with the applicant s right to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions due to a 2006 final domestic court decision which maintained a rental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57065
SAVATIN v. Romania
SAVATIN v. Romania ROU 13/12/2016 00:00:00 16/12/2016 16:48:18 Case Description: The case concerns the ill treatment suffered by the applicant in 2010 as a result of the conduct of the law enforcement officers substantive violation of Article 3 . Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45757
SAVCA v. the Republic of Moldova
SAVCA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 15/06/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Poor material conditions of detention and overcrowding in Prison no. 13 amounting to degrading treatment and remand in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7130
SAVIC v. Slovakia
SAVIC v. Slovakia SVK 24/09/1998 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of the applicant s detention on remand and excessive length of the related proceedings. Article 5 3 4 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7809
SAVINSKIY v. Ukraine
SAVINSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 28/05/2006 00:00:00 07/11/2016 14:16:38 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Quashing of a final judgment in criminal proceedings under the supervisory review protest procedure. Article 6 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26162
SAVITSKYY v. Ukraine
SAVITSKYY v. Ukraine UKR 26/10/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns the hindrance by the authorities of the effective exercise by the applicant of his right of petition to the Court by failing to provide him with copies of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31622
SAVOTCHKO v. the Republic of Moldova
SAVOTCHKO v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 28/06/2017 00:00:00 12/07/2017 17:01:36 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Interference due to the disclosure of the applicant s telephone records provided by the national landline EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47385
SAVRAN v. Denmark
SAVRAN v. Denmark DNK 07/12/2021 00:00:00 10/12/2021 10:51:13 Case Description: The cases concern expulsion orders combined with permanent re entry bans following criminal convictions finally upheld during proceedings requesting revocation of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59071
SAVU v. Romania
SAVU v. Romania ROU 04/02/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Quashing of final court decisions by the Supreme Court following an application for nullity lodged by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16755
SAVVIDES v. Cyprus
SAVVIDES v. Cyprus CYP 14/12/2021 00:00:00 16/12/2021 17:16:40 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Disproportionate hindrance in access to a court on account of the Family Court of Appeal s excessively formalistic refusal to examine the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59145
SAYGILI AND BILGIC v. Turkey
SAYGILI AND BILGIC v. Turkey TUR 20/08/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the closure of a newspaper for a period of 30 days which was erroneously considered to be the successor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37244