Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 241 - 260 of 2120
BETTERIDGE v. the United Kingdom
BETTERIDGE v. the United Kingdom GBR 29/04/2013 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unreasonable delay in the Parole Board review of the applicant s eligibility for release following the expiry of his tariff EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2949
BETTINA MALEK v. Austria
BETTINA MALEK v. Austria AUT 21/01/2005 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings before administrative courts. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1039
BEUZE v. Belgium
BEUZE v. Belgium BEL 09/11/2018 00:00:00 16/11/2018 14:46:27 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of criminal proceedings as a whole due to the fact that procedural defects which had occurred at pre trial stage EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50769
BEVACQUA AND S. v. Bulgaria
BEVACQUA AND S. v. Bulgaria BGR 12/09/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Failure to take appropriate action in the context of divorce proceedings in particular to decide rapidly on interim custody EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14743
BEYELER v. Italy
BEYELER v. Italy ITA 05/01/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference on account of the conditions under which the state exercised its pre emptive right to a painting by Van Gogh 11 years EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-42743
BEZRUKOVY v. Russia
BEZRUKOVY v. Russia RUS 10/08/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns unjustified extension of an expired time limit to appeal in civil proceedings to which the applicants were a party and the subsequent quashing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13691
BEZYMYANNAYA v. Russia
BEZYMYANNAYA v. Russia RUS 22/03/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the fact that domestic courts declines their jurisdiction to hear the applicant s claim EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27724
BHANDARI v. the United Kingdom
BHANDARI v. the United Kingdom GBR 31/03/2008 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings before the High Court of the Isle of Man. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2808
BIALAS JANUSZ v. Poland
BIALAS JANUSZ v. Poland POL 28/10/2009 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:14:57 Case Description: Denial of access to a court concerning certain benefits related to the applicant s service as a prison officer: The opinions of the Supreme Court and the Supreme EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39869
BIGOVIC v. Montenegro
BIGOVIC v. Montenegro MNE 19/06/2019 00:00:00 17/07/2019 15:36:28 Case Description: This case concerns the applicant s degrading treatment on account of poor conditions of his detention in an overcrowded remand prison between February 2006 and August 2009 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52527
BILOTSERKIVSKA v. Ukraine
BILOTSERKIVSKA v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2022 00:00:00 04/02/2022 11:30:26 Case Description: The case concerns the refusal of the Central Election Commission the CEC to register the applicant as a self nominated candidate for the 2012 parliamentary elections EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59579
BIONDIC v. Croatia
BIONDIC v. Croatia HRV 02/06/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court in civil proceedings instituted by a third party to contest an inheritance due to the rejection of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12199
BIRO v. Slovakia
BIRO v. Slovakia SVK 15/02/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7871
BISTIEVA AND OTHERS v. Poland
BISTIEVA AND OTHERS v. Poland POL 10/07/2018 00:00:00 07/08/2018 10:05:42 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure to provide sufficient reasons to justify the administrative detention in 2014 for five months and twenty days of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50019
BITTO AND OTHERS v. Slovakia
BITTO AND OTHERS v. Slovakia SVK 28/04/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:46:05 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to unjust limitations on the use of property by landlords in particular through the rent control scheme. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7709
BJARKI H. DIEGO v. Iceland
BJARKI H. DIEGO v. Iceland ISL 15/06/2022 00:00:00 03/07/2022 22:00:17 Case Description: The case concerns unfair criminal proceedings leading to the applicant s a former director within the Kaupthing bank conviction in 2016 for offences related to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60737
BJEDOV v. Croatia
BJEDOV v. Croatia HRV 29/08/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 15:28:29 Case Description: Protection of private life and home: Disproportionate interference on account of the domestic courts decisions ordering the applicants to leave State owned flats failing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12035
BJORK EIDSDOTTIR v. Iceland
BJORK EIDSDOTTIR v. Iceland ISL 10/10/2012 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:27:37 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to convictions of the applicant journalists in civil defamation proceedings brought against them on the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-71
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway NOR 20/05/1999 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper company and its editor being convicted in civil defamation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-173
BLUMBERGA v. Latvia
BLUMBERGA v. Latvia LVA 14/01/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:49 Case Description: Lack of access to a court: Refusal of courts to examine the merits of civil claims on the ground that the due amount of a court fee due had not been paid and partial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31098