Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 801 - 820 of 2064
IVASHCHENKO v. Ukraine
IVASHCHENKO v. Ukraine UKR 10/09/2020 00:00:00 15/09/2020 16:30:03 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and right to liberty and security: Unjustified confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during criminal proceedings against him and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55889
IWANCZUK v. Poland
IWANCZUK v. Poland POL 15/02/2002 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:14:57 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Ill treatment due to regular strip searches without justification unjustified length of pre trial detention excessive length of criminal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39847
IZMIR SAVAS KARSITLARI DERNEGI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
IZMIR SAVAS KARSITLARI DERNEGI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 02/06/2006 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Freedom of association: Unlawful interference due to criminal convictions to prison sentences commuted into fines of association members EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5526
J.B. v. the Czech Republic
J.B. v. the Czech Republic CZE 21/10/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of a possibility to cross examine several witnesses in criminal proceedings for trafficking in human beings and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6328
J.I. v. Croatia
J.I. v. Croatia HRV 30/01/2023 00:00:00 13/02/2023 14:31:45 Case Description: This case concerns the authorities failure to effectively investigate in 2015 reported death threats against the applicant coming from her father who had been convicted for her EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62583
J.L. v. Italy
J.L. v. Italy ITA 27/08/2021 00:00:00 17/09/2021 10:48:18 Case Description: The case concerned criminal proceedings between 2008 and 2015 against seven men who had been charged with the gang rape of the applicant and had been acquitted by the Italian EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58375
J.M. AND A.T. v. North Macedonia
J.M. AND A.T. v. North Macedonia MKD 22/10/2020 00:00:00 03/11/2020 18:11:46 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate and unjustified interference on account of the disclosure by a public hospital to the police of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56153
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France FRA 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment suffered by 27 of the applicants due to prison overcrowding and poor conditions of their detention personal space of less EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55363
J-P.D.V. v. France
J P.D.V. v. France FRA 12/10/1994 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:51:28 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and protection of private life and correspondence: Excessive length of detention on remand as well as telephone conversations intercepted EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31362
J.R. v. Belgium
J.R. v. Belgium BEL 24/04/2017 00:00:00 24/05/2017 13:19:47 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair trial due to length of the criminal proceedings brought against the father of a family who had been accused of being the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46825
J. S. v. Austria
J. S. v. Austria AUT 19/12/2000 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Prohibition of double conviction: Conviction of the applicant by the administrative authorities for driving while drunk and subsequent conviction by the criminal courts for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-865
JACIMOVIC v. Croatia
JACIMOVIC v. Croatia HRV 24/03/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the failure of administrative authorities and domestic courts to properly address the applicant s arguments in Ja EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10113
JAKOBSKI v. Poland
JAKOBSKI v. Poland POL 07/03/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Freedom of religion: Refusal to provide a detainee with a meat free diet in conformity with the requirements of his Buddhist faith. Status of Execution: The applicant was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18973
JALOUD v. the Netherlands
JALOUD v. the Netherlands NLD 20/11/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:15:35 Case Description: Right to life. Actions of security forces in Iraq: Ineffectiveness of investigation into the circumstances surrounding the death in Iraq of the applicant s son an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5952
JANATUINEN v. Finland
JANATUINEN v. Finland FIN 08/03/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of equality of arms and the breach of the applicant s right to adequate facilities for the preparation of his defence due to the destruction by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5988
JANIASHVILI v. Georgia
JANIASHVILI v. Georgia GEO 27/02/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:08:10 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Decisions of domestic courts on detention pending trial framed in abstract terms and lacking reasoning relying on stereotyped formula EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3363
JANULIS v. Poland
JANULIS v. Poland POL 16/01/2020 00:00:00 30/01/2020 15:08:36 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings and the lack of effective domestic remedy. Article 6 1 and 13 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54651
JASAR v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
JASAR v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 15/05/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Lack of an effective investigation into the allegations of ill treatment of Roma applicants in the hands of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6458
JASINSKA v. Poland
JASINSKA v. Poland POL 01/09/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Failure to protect the life of a prisoner: deficiency in the prison system that allowed a first time prisoner who was mentally fragile to gather a lethal dose of psychotropic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18883
JASINSKIS v. Latvia
JASINSKIS v. Latvia LVA 21/03/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Right to life: Death of the applicant s deaf and mute son due to the lack of his adequate and timely medical treatment following his placement in the sobering up room of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12680