Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 42
AGANIKYAN v. Armenia
AGANIKYAN v. Armenia ARM 05/04/2018 00:00:00 18/04/2018 09:59:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49313
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 28/11/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the retroactive application of Law No. 266/2005 to pending judicial proceedings concerning the approximately 310 applicants length of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28264
AHMET YILDIRIM v. Turkey
AHMET YILDIRIM v. Turkey TUR 18/03/2013 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: These cases concern a violation of the applicants right to freedom of expression on account of domestic court orders blocking access to Google Sites and YouTube EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37256
ALIMUCAJ v. Albania
ALIMUCAJ v. Albania ALB 09/07/2012 00:00:00 24/10/2016 17:59:35 Case Description: No punishment without law: Infringement of the principle of legality of criminal offences and punishments due to imposition of a heavier penalty than the one liable for at EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-337
BALKUNAS v. Lithuania
BALKUNAS v. Lithuania LTU 07/07/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate limitation of the applicant s right of access to a tribunal due to the refusal of the Supreme Court in 2017 to partly exempt him EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55627
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
DORNEANU v. Romania
DORNEANU v. Romania ROU 28/02/2018 00:00:00 16/03/2018 17:33:32 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman treatment suffered by the applicant an inmate afflicted with terminal prostate cancer. The European Court ruled that his continued detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49135
FEILAZOO v. Malta
FEILAZOO v. Malta MLT 11/06/2021 00:00:00 24/06/2021 17:58:49 Case Description: This case concerns the inadequate conditions of the applicant s detention pending deportation in the periods from 16 to 23 May 2019 and from 15 September 2019 to 13 November EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57955
FIL LLC v. Armenia
FIL LLC v. Armenia ARM 30/04/2019 00:00:00 13/08/2019 15:02:13 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings related to the applicant s compensation claim against a private company due to the lack EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52343
HORVATH AND KISS v. Hungary
HORVATH AND KISS v. Hungary HUN 29/04/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: The case concerns discrimination against the applicants born in 1994 and 1992 respectively who are of Roma 1 origin on account of their placement in a special school EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10905
I.D. v. the Republic of Moldova
I.D. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:43:32 Case Description: This group of cases concerns poor material conditions of detention in establishments under the authority of the Ministries of the Interior and Justice and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13946
IGNATOV v. Ukraine
IGNATOV v. Ukraine UKR 15/03/2017 00:00:00 31/03/2017 16:56:44 Case Description: The cases of the Ignatov group concern structural problems relating to arrest and pre trial detention. They concern certain deficiencies in the legislation in particular the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46503
JEAN-JACQUES MOREL v. France
JEAN JACQUES MOREL v. France FRA 10/01/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:01:18 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation of a municipal councillor to pay a fine and compensation after having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28467
KABOGLU AND ORAN v. Turkey
KABOGLU AND ORAN v. Turkey TUR 18/03/2019 00:00:00 05/04/2019 11:14:01 Case Description: The case concerns the violation of the right to respect for private life on account of the authorities failure to protect the applicants privacy against infringements EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51873
KARABET AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KARABET AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 17/04/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern principally large scale violence against prisoners with the involvement of special forces rapid reaction units and prison staff either as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32113
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
KHADIJA ISMAYILOVA v. Azerbaijan
KHADIJA ISMAYILOVA v. Azerbaijan AZE 10/04/2019 00:00:00 04/07/2019 17:16:59 Case Description: The application No. 65286/13 concerns violations of the rights of the applicant a renowned investigative journalist to respect for her private life and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52409
KLYAKHIN v. Russia
KLYAKHIN v. Russia RUS 06/06/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: All the cases in this group concern violations of the applicants right to liberty and security in the context of detention on remand mostly arising from: Article 5 1: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14064
KOSTIC v. Serbia
KOSTIC v. Serbia SRB 25/02/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 14:45:07 Case Description: The majority of these cases concerns violations of the applicants rights to access to a court where: i the authorities since 1996 failed to enforce or enforced with significant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8635
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213