Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 161
A.P., M.P. AND T.P. v. Switzerland
A.P. M.P. AND T.P. v. Switzerland CHE 29/08/1997 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Infringement of the presumption of innocence as the applicants had as heirs been convicted of a tax offence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4634
A. v. Croatia
A. v. Croatia HRV 14/01/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of private life: Failure of authorities to provide adequate protection against domestic violence due to various shortcomings e.g. individual programme during prison EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10339
ADIYAMAN v. Turkey
ADIYAMAN v. Turkey TUR 09/01/2018 00:00:00 12/01/2018 10:16:53 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified and disproportionate interference due to disciplinary sanctions imposed on prisoners for having expressed peaceful opinions. Article 10 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48589
AKTIVA DOO v. Serbia
AKTIVA DOO v. Serbia SRB 19/04/2021 00:00:00 11/06/2021 17:47:07 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate confiscation in 2005 of the applicant company s goods imported legally but in breach of record keeping regulations for which a fine EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57723
AKYOL AND OTHERS v. Turkey
AKYOL AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 26/05/2020 00:00:00 26/05/2020 16:45:54 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interference on account of disciplinary punishments eleven days of solitary confinement imposed under the Regulations on the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55167
ALBAYRAK v. Turkey
ALBAYRAK v. Turkey TUR 07/07/2008 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Interference due to insufficiently justified disciplinary measures imposed on a judge by the Supreme Council of Judges and Public Prosecutors for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5512
ALBERTI v. Italy
ALBERTI v. Italy ITA 24/09/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Ill treatment of the applicants by law enforcement agents in the context of their arrest and ineffectiveness the ensuing criminal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28300
ALDEMIR v. Turkey
ALDEMIR v. Turkey TUR 22/12/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of criminal proceedings due to the failure to hold hearings in cases in which payment of small fines were imposed on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-29591
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The group of cases Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicants right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans on the holding of gay EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14136
ALI v. Romania
ALI v. Romania ROU 09/02/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 12:37:00 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Overcrowding and poor material conditions in prison and police detention facilities and other EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14169
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia RUS 09/12/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These two cases concern the blanket ban on voting rights imposed automatically pursuant to Article 32 3 of the Constitution on all convicted offenders deprived of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14110
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine UKR 05/03/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns principally the failure of the domestic authorities to carry out effective investigations into allegations of medical negligence by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31636
ARTASHES ANTONYAN v. Armenia
ARTASHES ANTONYAN v. Armenia ARM 22/01/2021 00:00:00 15/03/2021 16:05:41 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Unlawful interference due to the administrative fine imposed for breaching customs regulations without domestic courts comprehensive EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56865
BAJIC v. Croatia
BAJIC v. Croatia HRV 13/02/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Right to life: Lack of an adequate prompt and effective investigation into the applicants claims that their relatives death resulted from medical malpractice. Article 2 in its EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10133
BARSOVA v. Russia
BARSOVA v. Russia RUS 22/10/2019 00:00:00 25/10/2019 16:33:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54105
BAYAR AND GURBUZ v. Turkey
BAYAR AND GURBUZ v. Turkey TUR 27/05/2013 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings in 2004 on account of the inadmissibility of the applicants appeal on points of law on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37292
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: The case of Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans over a period of three EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48317
BECKER v. Norway
BECKER v. Norway NOR 05/01/2018 00:00:00 15/01/2018 16:40:37 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Insufficient reasons given by domestic court to compel a journalist to give evidence in criminal proceedings against her source who had already come EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48683
BERGENS TIDENDE & OTHERS v. Norway
BERGENS TIDENDE OTHERS v. Norway NOR 02/08/2000 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper and its two editors being convicted in civil defamation proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-177