Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 2061 - 2080 of 3177
NICULESCU v. Romania
NICULESCU v. Romania ROU 25/09/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 13:36:55 Case Description: Protection of private and family life as well as correspondence and conditions of detention: absence of judicial guarantees related to the interception of the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14206
NICUT-TANASESCU v. Romania
NICUT TANASESCU v. Romania ROU 06/10/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Detention ordered by a prosecutor without bringing the detained person before a judge promptly but only after eight days. Article 5 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16567
NIEDBALA v. Poland
NIEDBALA v. Poland POL 04/07/2000 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and protection of private life: Detention on remand ordered by public prosecutor not offering sufficient guarantees of independence without EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17773
NIEDERBOSTER v. Germany
NIEDERBOSTER v. Germany DEU 27/05/2003 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings before the Federal Constitutional Court with regard to requests of visiting and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38340
NIEDZWIECKI v. Germany
NIEDZWIECKI v. Germany DEU 15/02/2006 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of family life and discrimination: Refusal of family benefits under the applicable federal legislation on family allowances for reasons of nationality EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38358
NIKITIN AND OTHERS v. Estonia
NIKITIN AND OTHERS v. Estonia EST 24/06/2019 00:00:00 17/07/2019 15:36:28 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / conditions of detention: Insufficient space during the applicants detention for various periods in Tallinn Prison and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52521
NIKOGHOSYAN v. Armenia
NIKOGHOSYAN v. Armenia ARM 06/03/2008 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:33:58 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings concerning a property sale due to the impossibility to take part in the hearing as the summons EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-413
NIKOGHOSYAN v. Armenia
NIKOGHOSYAN v. Armenia ARM 18/05/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Delayed enforcement of a final domestic judgment in favour of the applicant regarding job EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47163
NIKOLAY DIMITROV v. Bulgaria
NIKOLAY DIMITROV v. Bulgaria BGR 27/12/2007 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Right to life and protection against ill treatment: Lacking effective investigation into the into deaths or alleged ill treatment inflicted by private individuals. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3817
NIKOLAY GENOV v. Bulgaria
NIKOLAY GENOV v. Bulgaria BGR 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the lack of sufficiently reasoned judgments as they failed to respond to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48311
NIKOLIC v. Serbia
NIKOLIC v. Serbia SRB 19/10/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Failure by the authorities to effectively protect the applicant s private life due to protracted and finally time barred criminal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58627
NIKOLIC v. Serbia
NIKOLIC v. Serbia SRB 25/11/2021 00:00:00 16/12/2021 17:16:40 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Failure to enforce final domestic judgments rendered in the applicant s favour. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59237
NIKOLOVA AND VANDOVA v. Bulgaria
NIKOLOVA AND VANDOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 17/03/2014 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of a public hearing in proceedings before the Supreme Administrative Court which unfolded between 2002 and 2003 and concerned the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3861
NIKOLOVA v. Bulgaria
NIKOLOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 25/03/1999 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Lack of judicial review of the decision to detain the applicant on remand and impossibility of challenging the lawfulness of this EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14277
NIKULA v. Finland
NIKULA v. Finland FIN 21/06/2002 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s conviction under the Criminal Code following certain statements made by her as a lawyer during EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4810
NILSEN & JOHNSEN v. Norway
NILSEN JOHNSEN v. Norway NOR 25/11/1999 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicants conviction in civil defamation proceedings following the publication of critical EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-175
NISIOTIS v. Greece
NISIOTIS v. Greece GRC 20/06/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: These cases concern the inhuman and/or degrading treatment of the applicants on account of the poor conditions of detention of the applicants in overcrowded prisons in Greece EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15760
NODET v. France
NODET v. France FRA 06/09/2019 00:00:00 16/09/2019 11:04:04 Case Description: Right not to be tried or punished twice: Imposition of a sanction by the Autorit des March s Financiers Authority of Financial Markets followed by a criminal conviction. Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52703
NORDICA LEASING SPA v. Italy
NORDICA LEASING SPA v. Italy ITA 14/01/2005 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court resulting in the applicant companies inability to recover sums due to them in proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43943
NOREIKIENE AND NOREIKA v. Lithuania
NOREIKIENE AND NOREIKA v. Lithuania LTU 24/02/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Protection of property: Significant disproportion between the compensation awarded for the deprivation of land by the authorities and the land s market value EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4349