Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 3061 - 3080 of 3177
WILKINSON AND ALLAN v. the United Kingdom
WILKINSON AND ALLAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 06/02/2001 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings before a court martial due to its failing independence and impartiality. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2504
WILLE v. Liechtenstein
WILLE v. Liechtenstein LIE 28/10/1999 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:30:30 Case Description: Les notes ne sont disponibles qu en anglais. Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: Just satisfaction for non pecuniary damage EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-79
WILLIS v. the United Kingdom
WILLIS v. the United Kingdom GBR 11/09/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of sex on the ground that social benefits for widowed parents were only available EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2550
WILSON, NATIONAL UNION OF JOURNALISTS AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom
WILSON NATIONAL UNION OF JOURNALISTS AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom GBR 02/10/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Freedom of association: Failure to secure freedom of association by permitting employers to use financial incentives to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2500
WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria
WIRTSCHAFTS TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria AUT 27/01/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation for publishing an article in the applicant company EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-967
WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT M.B.H. v. Austria
WIRTSCHAFTS TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT M.B.H. v. Austria AUT 13/03/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation for publishing an article in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-979
WISSE v. France
WISSE v. France FRA 20/03/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Unlawful interference due to the recording of remand detainees conversations with their relatives in detention centres visiting rooms. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33245
WITKOWSKI v. Poland
WITKOWSKI v. Poland POL 13/03/2019 00:00:00 03/04/2019 16:35:04 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court due to the applicant s inability to appeal against a judgment given against him by the first EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51865
WITOLD LITWA v. Poland
WITOLD LITWA v. Poland POL 04/04/2000 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Arbitrary detention in a sobering up centre. Article 5 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17757
WIZERKANIUK v. Poland
WIZERKANIUK v. Poland POL 05/10/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the criminal conviction of a chief editor and co owner of a local newspaper for the publication of an interview EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20600
WLOCH v. Poland
WLOCH v. Poland POL 22/01/2001 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and effective functioning of justice: Unlawful detention lack of adversarial principle in the review proceedings and excessive EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17769
WOKKE v. the Netherlands
WOKKE v. the Netherlands NLD 31/10/1998 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4467
WOLOSOWICZ v. Poland
WOLOSOWICZ v. Poland POL 12/07/2018 00:00:00 07/08/2018 10:05:42 Case Description: Conditions of detention / Protection against ill treatment: Inadequate prison conditions in Siedlce Prison in an overcrowded cells. Article 3 Status of Execution: Case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50023
WOLTER AND SARFERT v. Germany
WOLTER AND SARFERT v. Germany DEU 23/06/2017 00:00:00 12/07/2017 17:01:36 Case Description: Discriminatory interference with the right to protection of property in that the applicants born out of wedlock in 1943 and 1940 respectively were unable to assert EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47447
WOMEN ON WAVES AND OTHERS v. Portugal
WOMEN ON WAVES AND OTHERS v. Portugal PRT 03/05/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the decision of the administrative authorities to prohibit the ship Borndiep which had been EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9671
WORWA v. Poland
WORWA v. Poland POL 14/06/2004 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unjustified interference due to the circumstances in which the applicant became subject to a series of psychiatric reports in criminal proceedings. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17755
X AND Y v. Croatia
X AND Y v. Croatia HRV 03/02/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of private life: Denial of a fair hearing due to lack of procedural safeguards in proceedings divesting the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10109
X AND Y v. Romania
X AND Y v. Romania ROU 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private live on account of the absence of a clear and foreseeable legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57459
X v. Croatia
X v. Croatia HRV 01/12/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Exclusion of the applicants in the case of X the applicant was divested of her capacity to act while in the case of A.K. and L. the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10089
X v. Poland
X v. Poland POL 28/02/2022 00:00:00 17/03/2022 16:35:22 Case Description: Refusal to grant applicant full parental rights and custody over her youngest child in 2009 based solely or decisively on considerations regarding her sexual orientation violation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59871