Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 281 - 293 of 293
VYERENTSOV v. Ukraine
VYERENTSOV v. Ukraine UKR 11/07/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: The Vyerentsov group of cases concerns various violations of the applicants right to freedom of assembly violation of Article 11 . The Vyerentsov case concerns violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31279
WALASEK v. Poland
WALASEK v. Poland POL 18/10/2018 00:00:00 22/11/2018 10:36:08 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment conditions of detention: Detention for 28 days in an overcrowded cell. Article 3 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50831
X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 17/04/2019 00:00:00 04/07/2019 17:16:59 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the transgender applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of the absence of quick transparent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52421
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine UKR 25/01/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31204
YANKOV v. Bulgaria
YANKOV v. Bulgaria BGR 11/03/2004 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and of rights in detention: Shaving of a detainee s head disciplinary punishment for insulting officials in the draft manuscript of a book EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14291
YASAR HOLDING A.S. v. Turkey
YASAR HOLDING A.S. v. Turkey TUR 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Unlawful interference unforeseeable and incompatible with the principle of legality on account of the transfer of management and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48307
YVON v. France
YVON v. France FRA 24/07/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Infringement of the principle of equality of arms in expropriation proceedings as the Government Commissioner a party to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33151
ZAICEVS v. Latvia
ZAICEVS v. Latvia LVA 31/10/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:33:38 Case Description: Right of appeal in criminal matters: Inability to challenge a sentence to three days administrative detention for contempt of court an offence under the Code of Regulatory EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31212
ZELENI BALKANI v. Bulgaria
ZELENI BALKANI v. Bulgaria BGR 12/07/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Freedom of assembly: Unlawful prohibition by municipal decision of a public assembly and the lack of an effective remedy against this prohibition as the domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14729
ZHECHEV v. Bulgaria
ZHECHEV v. Bulgaria BGR 21/09/2007 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Freedom of association: Unjustified interference due to refusal by domestic courts to register an association on the ground that its aims were political i.e. characteristic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3795
ZHELYAZKOV v. Bulgaria
ZHELYAZKOV v. Bulgaria BGR 09/01/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Denial of the right of appeal in criminal matters: Impossibility to file an appeal against a conviction for a minor public order offence imposing a sanction of fifteen EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14555
ZILIBERBERG v. the Republic of Moldova
ZILIBERBERG v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 01/05/2005 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair trial due to the domestic courts failure to summon the applicants properly thus depriving them of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6740
ZORICA JOVANOVIC v. Serbia
ZORICA JOVANOVIC v. Serbia SRB 09/09/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for her family life on account of the respondent State s continuing failure to provide her with EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7011