Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 13 of 13
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
C.G. AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
C.G. AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 24/07/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: The cases C.G. and Others Kurilovich and Others M. and Others and Bou Hassoun concern shortcomings in the procedure for judicial review of decisions to expel foreign EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3769
CHAHAL v. the United Kingdom
CHAHAL v. the United Kingdom GBR 15/11/1996 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment protection of rights in detention effective remedy: Risk of ill treatment in case of the applicant s deportation to India lack of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2388
E. S. AND OTHERS v. Slovakia
E. S. AND OTHERS v. Slovakia SVK 15/12/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and protection of private and family life: Failure of authorities to protect the applicants wife and daughter from ill treatment EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8451
GEBREMEDHIN [GABERAMADHIEN] v. France
GEBREMEDHIN GABERAMADHIEN v. France FRA 26/07/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Lack of an effective remedy with automatic suspensive effect as requested by the Convention to defend the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33047
ILIAS AND AHMED v. Hungary
ILIAS AND AHMED v. Hungary HUN 21/11/2019 00:00:00 28/11/2019 17:12:23 Case Description: The case of Ilias and Ahmed concerns the authorities failure to comply with their procedural obligation under Article 3 to assess the risks of ill treatment before EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54279
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France FRA 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment suffered by 27 of the applicants due to prison overcrowding and poor conditions of their detention personal space of less EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55363
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
LIU v. Russia (no. 2)
LIU v. Russia no. 2 RUS 03/08/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants exclusion on national security grounds from the Russian Federation in different time periods from 2004 to 2015 in violation of their right EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14148
M.K. AND OTHERS v. Poland
M.K. AND OTHERS v. Poland POL 14/12/2020 00:00:00 12/01/2021 13:34:45 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the Convention on account of refusals of border guards to receive asylum application from the applicants on various occasions between EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56535
MOUSTAHI v. France
MOUSTAHI v. France FRA 25/09/2020 00:00:00 28/10/2020 12:05:36 Case Description: This case concerns the measures taken following the illegal entry into Mayotte French department in the Indian Ocean of the first applicant s children legally resident there EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56109
PETRELLA v. Italy
PETRELLA v. Italy ITA 06/09/2021 00:00:00 23/09/2021 15:54:44 Case Description: The case concerned the length of the preliminary investigations between 2001 and 2007 in the context of criminal proceedings brought on the basis of a complaint by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58411
RANA v. Hungary
RANA v. Hungary HUN 16/07/2020 00:00:00 23/07/2020 11:27:33 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities refusal in 2016 to change the transgender refugee applicant s name and sex marker from female to male due to a gap in the relevant legislation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55665