Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 21
A. v. Croatia
A. v. Croatia HRV 14/01/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of private life: Failure of authorities to provide adequate protection against domestic violence due to various shortcomings e.g. individual programme during prison EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10339
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BRANKO TOMASIC AND OTHERS v. Croatia
BRANKO TOMASIC AND OTHERS v. Croatia HRV 15/04/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Right to life: Failure to protect the lives of the applicants relatives from a person who had been previously convicted of threatening to kill them Branko EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10317
CITRARO AND MOLINO v. Italy
CITRARO AND MOLINO v. Italy ITA 04/06/2020 00:00:00 04/06/2020 19:55:36 Case Description: The case of Sy concerns the detention between December 2018 and May 2020 of the applicant who had a psychiatric condition aggravated by drug addiction in an ordinary EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55275
CORALLO v. the Netherlands
CORALLO v. the Netherlands NLD 09/10/2018 00:00:00 18/10/2018 16:08:29 Case Description: This case concerns the poor conditions of the applicant s detention in the Philipsburg Police Station on Sint Maarten situated in the Caribbean where he was detained EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50579
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/06/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: These cases concern disproportionate and unjustified interferences with the applicants right to respect for their private lives due to the indefinite retention of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55601
GUVEC v. Turkey
GUVEC v. Turkey TUR 20/04/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the prohibition of inhuman and degrading treatment for detaining the applicant a minor for five years in a prison for adults as well as the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37407
IZZETTIN DOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
IZZETTIN DOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 26/04/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:16:29 Case Description: This group concerns the failure within the Turkish legal framework to grant legal recognition to the Alevi faith 1 thus depriving its followers of the right EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37402
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France FRA 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment suffered by 27 of the applicants due to prison overcrowding and poor conditions of their detention personal space of less EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55363
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
KORNEV AND KARPENKO v. Ukraine
KORNEV AND KARPENKO v. Ukraine UKR 21/01/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair administrative responsibility proceedings due to the lack of adequate time and facilities for the preparation of the second EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31130
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
MCFARLANE v. Ireland
MCFARLANE v. Ireland IRL 10/09/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 16:50:41 Case Description: This case concerns the excessive length of both criminal and civil proceedings and the lack of an effective remedy for these problems violations of Articles 6 1 and 13 . EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1944
MUGEMANGANGO v. Belgium
MUGEMANGANGO v. Belgium BEL 10/07/2020 00:00:00 29/07/2020 17:07:09 Case Description: The Mugemangango case concerns the absence of a procedure offering adequate and sufficient safeguards to prevent arbitrariness and to ensure effective examination of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55685
STANEV v. Bulgaria
STANEV v. Bulgaria BGR 17/01/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: This case concerns the placement of the applicant subject to a partial guardianship order following a diagnosis of schizophrenia in a social care home. The Court found that EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3767
STANIMIROVIC v. Serbia
STANIMIROVIC v. Serbia SRB 08/03/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the ineffective investigations into the allegations of ill treatment by police officers procedural violations of Article 3 ill treatment by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7310
SY v. Italy
SY v. Italy ITA 24/04/2022 00:00:00 06/05/2022 12:33:12 Case Description: The case of Sy concerns the detention between December 2018 and May 2020 of the applicant who had a psychiatric condition aggravated by drug addiction in an ordinary prison despite EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60281
SZABO AND VISSY v. Hungary
SZABO AND VISSY v. Hungary HUN 06/06/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group concerns the violation of the applicants right to respect for private and family life and for correspondence on account of the Hungarian legislation on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10745
TICU v. Romania
TICU v. Romania ROU 01/01/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern the ill treatment suffered by the applicants in various prisons due to the inadequate management of their severe psychiatric conditions from 2003 to 2019. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13270
VASILESCU v. Belgium
VASILESCU v. Belgium BEL 20/04/2015 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: These cases concern the inhuman and degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to the following material conditions of their detention taken as a whole violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1262