Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 401 - 420 of 1013
IUSTIN ROBERTINO MICU v. Romania
IUSTIN ROBERTINO MICU v. Romania ROU 13/04/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:28:55 Case Description: This case concerns the applicant s ill treatment on account of failure by the authorities to provide the applicant with food for about 10 hours in March 2010 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17609
IVANOVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
IVANOVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 21/04/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of private life: Denial of a fair trial due to shortcomings in lustration EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6594
"IZA" LTD AND MAKRAKHIDZE v. Georgia
IZA LTD AND MAKRAKHIDZE v. Georgia GEO 27/12/2005 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:08:10 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice protection of property and lack of effective remedy: Failure of the State budgetary institutions to enforcement EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3335
IZZETTIN DOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
IZZETTIN DOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 26/04/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:16:29 Case Description: This group concerns the failure within the Turkish legal framework to grant legal recognition to the Alevi faith 1 thus depriving its followers of the right EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37402
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France FRA 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment suffered by 27 of the applicants due to prison overcrowding and poor conditions of their detention personal space of less EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55363
JAKOBSKI v. Poland
JAKOBSKI v. Poland POL 07/03/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Freedom of religion: Refusal to provide a detainee with a meat free diet in conformity with the requirements of his Buddhist faith. Status of Execution: The applicant was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18973
JAKUB v. Slovakia
JAKUB v. Slovakia SVK 28/05/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings some of them concerning disputes which should have been resolved with special diligence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8101
JANIASHVILI v. Georgia
JANIASHVILI v. Georgia GEO 27/02/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:08:10 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Decisions of domestic courts on detention pending trial framed in abstract terms and lacking reasoning relying on stereotyped formula EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3363
JANOSEVIC v. Sweden
JANOSEVIC v. Sweden SWE 21/05/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:44:38 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Tax authority s failure to act with the required urgency and thereby unduly delaying a judicial determination of the issues EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2106
JASIUNIENE v. Lithuania
JASIUNIENE v. Lithuania LTU 06/06/2003 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice and protection of property: Authorities failure to enforce binding court decisions ordering the restitution or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4175
JEANS v. Croatia
JEANS v. Croatia HRV 13/01/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings and lack of an effective remedy. Articles 6 1 and 13 Status of Execution: Case closed. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10097
JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES OF MOSCOW AND OTHERS v. Russia
JEHOVAH S WITNESSES OF MOSCOW AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 22/11/2010 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:53:14 Case Description: This group of cases Taganrog LRO concerns violation of various rights of the Jehovah s Witnesses. The case of Taganrog LRO concerns violation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22998
JEVREMOVIC v. Serbia
JEVREMOVIC v. Serbia SRB 17/10/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of the applicants right to a fair trial on account of excessive length of different types of judicial proceedings civil family EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7031
JGARKAVA v. Georgia
JGARKAVA v. Georgia GEO 24/05/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:08:10 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial a fair trial due to the refusal without clear or sufficient reasons to award compensation after the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3341
JUEZ ALBIZU v. Spain
JUEZ ALBIZU v. Spain ESP 10/02/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:12:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial due to the lack of reasoning in a court decision dismissing the appeal in civil proceedings brought EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3537
JURISIC v. Croatia
JURISIC v. Croatia HRV 16/01/2020 00:00:00 30/01/2020 15:08:36 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for his family life on account of non enforcement of judicial decisions whereby the applicant was granted EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54667
K.A. v. Finland
K.A. v. Finland FIN 14/04/2003 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Protection of family life: Failure to take adequate measures to reunite the applicant parents and their three children following the children s placement in a foster family EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4798
K.J. v. Poland
K.J. v. Poland POL 01/06/2016 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These cases concern violation of the applicants right to respect for family life on account of the authorities failure to facilitate reunion between the applicants and their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20638
K.O. AND V.M. v. Norway
K.O. AND V.M. v. Norway NOR 15/04/2020 00:00:00 29/04/2020 09:24:01 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to the authorities decisions to only allow the applicants contact with their child four or six EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55133
KABILI v. Greece
KABILI v. Greece GRC 31/10/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 15:44:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Infringement of the presumption of innocence on account of the reasoning of judicial decisions rejecting the applicants claims EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15170