Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 781 - 800 of 1013
RONALD VERMEULEN v. Belgium
RONALD VERMEULEN v. Belgium BEL 17/10/2018 00:00:00 05/11/2018 16:01:55 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to court resulting from the Conseil d tat s dismissal of the applicant s appeal due to its failure EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50711
ROSENZWEIG AND BONDED WAREHOUSES LTD. v. Poland
ROSENZWEIG AND BONDED WAREHOUSES LTD. v. Poland POL 30/11/2005 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Disproportionate control of property use due to the revocations without precise reason of an export permit and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18013
ROSSI AND NALDINI v. Italy
ROSSI AND NALDINI v. Italy ITA 11/03/2004 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of property: Impossibility for the applicants to obtain the assistance of the police to implement judicial decisions ordering their tenants eviction. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-42659
ROTARU v. Romania
ROTARU v. Romania ROU 04/05/2000 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Insufficient safeguards against arbitrary in the processing of personal data: interference with the applicant s right to private life owing to the storage and public EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15963
ROTONDO AND OTHERS v. Italy
ROTONDO AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 24/11/2022 00:00:00 15/12/2022 17:14:34 Case Description: These cases concern the non execution or delay in the execution of domestic decisions in the framework of a compensatory remedy Pinto to victims of excessively EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62230
ROZSA v. Hungary
ROZSA v. Hungary HUN 28/07/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Denial of access to court due to the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court s decisions resulting in the applicants inability to seek compensation in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10501
RTBF v. Belgium
RTBF v. Belgium BEL 15/09/2011 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: Freedom of expression and access to an efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful interference due to the lack of a predictable legal framework as well as clear and constant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1209
RUIANU v. Romania
RUIANU v. Romania ROU 17/09/2003 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Failure to execute final and enforceable court decisions due to various deficiencies in regarding EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13077
RUTKOWSKI v. Poland
RUTKOWSKI v. Poland POL 07/10/2015 00:00:00 07/11/2016 16:53:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26436
RYABYKH v. Russia
RYABYKH v. Russia RUS 03/12/2003 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: infringement of the principle of legal certainty on account of the quashing of final judicial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14074
RYAKIB BIRYUKOV v. Russia
RYAKIB BIRYUKOV v. Russia RUS 07/07/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Lack of public access to the reasoning of judicial decisions in civil and criminal matters between 2001 and 2009 as the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13659
S.C. CONTINENTAL HOTELS S.A. v. Romania
S.C. CONTINENTAL HOTELS S.A. v. Romania ROU 08/10/2019 00:00:00 14/10/2019 17:04:30 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate interference with the right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions of the applicant a privatised company as a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52979
S.C. IMH SUCEAVA S.R.L. v. Romania
S.C. IMH SUCEAVA S.R.L. v. Romania ROU 29/01/2014 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Denial of a fair trial: Different decisions without sufficient reasons by two domestic courts as to the validity and reliability of the same piece of evidence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17552
S.I. v. Slovenia
S.I. v. Slovenia SVN 13/01/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:49 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference as a result of the excessive length of proceedings concerning custody and visiting rights relating to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7142
SÄRGAVA v. Estonia
S RGAVA v. Estonia EST 16/02/2022 00:00:00 03/03/2022 15:55:23 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of sufficient procedural safeguards to protect privileged data during the seizure and the subsequent examination of a lawyer s laptop and mobile EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59837
S.Z. v. Bulgaria
S.Z. v. Bulgaria BGR 03/06/2015 00:00:00 26/10/2016 15:12:04 Case Description: The group S.Z. which includes also the cases X. and Others Y. Y.P. and Z. concerns ineffective investigations into rape false imprisonment and incitement to prostitution and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1934
SAADI v. Italy
SAADI v. Italy ITA 28/02/2008 00:00:00 10/11/2016 09:49:20 Case Description: Risk of torture or ill treatment if deportation orders to Tunisia were to be enforced Status of Execution: As regards individual measures all the expulsion orders against the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36567
SABANCHIYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
SABANCHIYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 06/09/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern the authorities refusal to return the bodies of the applicants relatives who were local insurgents and were killed during anti terrorist EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13934
SACALEANU v. Romania
SACALEANU v. Romania ROU 06/12/2005 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 19 judgments in respect of 101 applications 1 relates to the long standing structural problem of non implementation or delayed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12744
SAID v. the Netherlands
SAID v. the Netherlands NLD 05/10/2005 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Risk of ill treatment in case of expulsion to Eritrea Article 3 conditional Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4539