Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 14 of 14
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
BEKIR-OUSTA AND OTHERS v. Greece
BEKIR OUSTA AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 11/01/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the right to freedom of association Article 11 due to the domestic courts rulings not to register associations Bekir Ousta and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15567
CUTEAN v. Romania
CUTEAN v. Romania ROU 02/03/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:30:30 Case Description: Unfairness of the criminal proceedings against the applicant due to his inability to be confronted with the witnesses in the presence of the judge who ultimately decided the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17613
CYPRUS v. Turkey
CYPRUS v. Turkey TUR 10/05/2001 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: The case concerns 14 violations in relation to the situation in the northern part of Cyprus since the military intervention by Turkey in July and August 1974 concerning: Greek EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37128
DIMON v. Romania
DIMON v. Romania ROU 27/02/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Rejection of an appeal on points of law in a claim concerning the attribution of formerly nationalised land due to failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16893
KERESELIDZE v. Georgia
KERESELIDZE v. Georgia GEO 28/06/2019 00:00:00 17/07/2019 15:36:28 Case Description: This case concerns unfair criminal proceedings which deprived the applicant of the opportunity to present his arguments regarding the alteration of the starting date of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52501
KOSTIC v. Serbia
KOSTIC v. Serbia SRB 25/02/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 14:45:07 Case Description: The majority of these cases concerns violations of the applicants rights to access to a court where: i the authorities since 1996 failed to enforce or enforced with significant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8635
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
LIMAN-IS SENDIKASI (NO 1) v. Turkey
LIMAN IS SENDIKASI NO 1 v. Turkey TUR 11/04/2011 00:00:00 09/02/2018 16:41:55 Case Description: The case of Liman Is 29608/05 concerns a violation of the right to a fair trial on account of the failure of the national authorities to enforce final EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37182
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey TUR 05/03/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: This group concerns violations of the right to freedom of peaceful assembly including the prosecution of participants and/or the use of excessive force to disperse peaceful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37415
ROSENGREN v. Romania
ROSENGREN v. Romania ROU 24/07/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Freedom of movement: Unlawful or disproportionate prohibition to leave the country or the city in the framework of criminal proceedings. Article 2 2 of Protocol No. 4 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16151
SERGEY VOLOSYUK v. Ukraine
SERGEY VOLOSYUK v. Ukraine UKR 12/06/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: These cases concern the unlawful interference with the applicants right to respect for their correspondence with various official bodies and institutions both while EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31112
SHVYDKA v. Ukraine
SHVYDKA v. Ukraine UKR 30/01/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:26:32 Case Description: The Shvydka case concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of expression due to her conviction and sentence to ten days detention for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37062
SISSANIS v. Romania
SISSANIS v. Romania ROU 25/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Freedom of movement: Unlawful or disproportionate prohibition to leave the country or the city in the framework of criminal proceedings. Article 2 2 of Protocol No. 4 Access EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16331