Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 38
AGEYEVY v. Russia
AGEYEVY v. Russia RUS 09/09/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: 5 violations of the right to respect for private and family life Article 8 of the applicants a married couple in the context of events which resulted in the removal of their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14030
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
BARSOVA v. Russia
BARSOVA v. Russia RUS 22/10/2019 00:00:00 25/10/2019 16:33:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54105
BERGENS TIDENDE & OTHERS v. Norway
BERGENS TIDENDE OTHERS v. Norway NOR 02/08/2000 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper and its two editors being convicted in civil defamation proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-177
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway NOR 20/05/1999 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper company and its editor being convicted in civil defamation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-173
BODROZIC v. Serbia
BODROZIC v. Serbia SRB 10/12/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 15:36:53 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to criminal sanctions for defamation imposed on journalists. Article 10 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8751
DABROWSKI v. Poland
DABROWSKI v. Poland POL 19/03/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interference due to conviction of a journalist for defamation in criminal proceedings for having published articles about the deputy EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18437
DALBAN v. Romania
DALBAN v. Romania ROU 28/09/1999 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Freedom of expression protection of private and family life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Criminal convictions of journalists for insult and/or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15961
EERIKAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland
EERIKAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 13/03/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to freedom of expression due to criminal or civil convictions between 2000 and 2011 for invading the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5968
FATULLAYEV v. Azerbaijan
FATULLAYEV v. Azerbaijan AZE 04/10/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the right to freedom of expression violations of Article 10 of the applicant journalists due in particular in both cases to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1727
GHIULFER PREDESCU v. Romania
GHIULFER PREDESCU v. Romania ROU 27/09/2017 00:00:00 12/10/2017 16:39:24 Case Description: This group of cases concerns unjustified interferences with the freedom of expression as a result of court decisions delivered in 2008 and 2017 respectively holding EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47937
IORDACHE v. Romania
IORDACHE v. Romania ROU 14/01/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice protection of family life and lack of effective remedy: Lack of access to a court due to substantial court fees prohibition of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16239
ISIKIRIK v. Turkey
ISIKIRIK v. Turkey TUR 09/04/2018 00:00:00 23/05/2018 15:49:31 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having expressed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49517
KANELLOPOULOU v. Greece
KANELLOPOULOU v. Greece GRC 31/03/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 15:44:49 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the criminal convictions imposed on the applicants for malicious defamation defamation or insult following EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15168
KATRAMI v. Greece
KATRAMI v. Greece GRC 06/03/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of the applicants freedom of expression due to the criminal convictions imposed on them for insult Article 361 Criminal Code defamation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15699
KURLOWICZ v. Poland
KURLOWICZ v. Poland POL 22/09/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of this group concern violations of the right to freedom of expression Article 10 due to the applicants politicians journalists or editors criminal conviction to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20608
KYDONIS v. Greece
KYDONIS v. Greece GRC 02/07/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 15:42:05 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interferences due to journalists and publishers criminal convictions imposed for defamation or insult. Article 10 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15126
L.P. AND CARVALHO v. Portugal
L.P. AND CARVALHO v. Portugal PRT 08/10/2019 00:00:00 14/10/2019 17:04:30 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the conviction of two lawyers for defamation L.P. and for attacking a person s honour Carvalho in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52983
LIGUE DU MONDE ISLAMIQUE v. France
LIGUE DU MONDE ISLAMIQUE v. France FRA 15/04/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: The obligation imposed on a foreign association without a head office in France to make a declaration to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33281