Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 79
A. v. Norway
A. v. Norway NOR 09/07/2009 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Protection of private life: Domestic courts failure to protect the applicant s reputation due to the unfavourable outcome of a defamation suit that he brought against a newspaper EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-205
ABRAMOVA v. Ukraine
ABRAMOVA v. Ukraine UKR 18/12/2018 00:00:00 07/01/2019 11:55:18 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the courts failure to examine the applicant s defamation claim against the prosecutor s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51049
AEPI S.A. v. Greece
AEPI S.A. v. Greece GRC 11/07/2002 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of excess to a court due to dismissals of appeals on points of law by the Court of Cassation as being out of time EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22216
ARMONIENE v. Lithuania
ARMONIENE v. Lithuania LTU 25/02/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Protection of private life: Failure to protect private lives due to the award of only a derisory sum in respect of non pecuniary damages in defamation proceedings brought EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4235
AVRAM AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova
AVRAM AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 05/10/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection of private life: Supreme Court s failure to award to the applicants as victims of defamation a proportionate compensation for the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6852
BERGENS TIDENDE & OTHERS v. Norway
BERGENS TIDENDE OTHERS v. Norway NOR 02/08/2000 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper and its two editors being convicted in civil defamation proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-177
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway NOR 20/05/1999 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper company and its editor being convicted in civil defamation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-173
BODROZIC v. Serbia
BODROZIC v. Serbia SRB 10/12/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 15:36:53 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to criminal sanctions for defamation imposed on journalists. Article 10 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8751
BOLDEA v. Romania
BOLDEA v. Romania ROU 15/05/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and freedom of expression: Unfair criminal proceedings for insult and defamation resulting in criminal convictions and/or award EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16319
DABROWSKI v. Poland
DABROWSKI v. Poland POL 19/03/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interference due to conviction of a journalist for defamation in criminal proceedings for having published articles about the deputy EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18437
DALBAN v. Romania
DALBAN v. Romania ROU 28/09/1999 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Freedom of expression protection of private and family life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Criminal convictions of journalists for insult and/or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15961
EDITORIAL BOARD OF PRAVOYE DELO AND SHTEKEL v. Ukraine
EDITORIAL BOARD OF PRAVOYE DELO AND SHTEKEL v. Ukraine UKR 05/08/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unlawful interference due to the court ordering a newspaper s editorial board and its editor in chief to apologise EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31614
EERIKAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland
EERIKAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 13/03/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to freedom of expression due to criminal or civil convictions between 2000 and 2011 for invading the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5968
EGILL EINARSSON v. Iceland
EGILL EINARSSON v. Iceland ISL 07/02/2018 00:00:00 16/03/2018 17:33:32 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference due to the dismissal of defamation proceedings brought by a public figure for the publication of a picture EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49139
FALZON v. Malta
FALZON v. Malta MLT 20/06/2018 00:00:00 07/08/2018 10:05:42 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s conviction to pay damages for defamation of an MP in journalistic statements presented in a question EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50015
FLUX (NO. 2) v. the Republic of Moldova
FLUX NO. 2 v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 03/10/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interferences as a result of court decisions holding the applicants newspapers and journalists liable in tort for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6656
GAVRILOVICI v. the Republic of Moldova
GAVRILOVICI v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 15/03/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interferences by domestic courts on account of the applicants convictions for defamation or public protest without EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6840
GAZETA UKRAINA-TSENTR v. Ukraine
GAZETA UKRAINA TSENTR v. Ukraine UKR 15/10/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Freedom of expression and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unnecessary interference due to the condemnation of a newspaper company in defamation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31126
GELEVSKI v. North Macedonia
GELEVSKI v. North Macedonia MKD 08/01/2021 00:00:00 29/01/2021 19:13:35 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s conviction for defamation for criticising a journalist in an opinion piece in a daily EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56607
GHIULFER PREDESCU v. Romania
GHIULFER PREDESCU v. Romania ROU 27/09/2017 00:00:00 12/10/2017 16:39:24 Case Description: This group of cases concerns unjustified interferences with the freedom of expression as a result of court decisions delivered in 2008 and 2017 respectively holding EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47937