Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 50
A.T. v. Austria
A.T. v. Austria AUT 21/06/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of a public oral hearing in compensation proceedings for defamation under the Media Act. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-847
ABRAMOVA v. Ukraine
ABRAMOVA v. Ukraine UKR 18/12/2018 00:00:00 07/01/2019 11:55:18 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the courts failure to examine the applicant s defamation claim against the prosecutor s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51049
AGEYEVY v. Russia
AGEYEVY v. Russia RUS 09/09/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: 5 violations of the right to respect for private and family life Article 8 of the applicants a married couple in the context of events which resulted in the removal of their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14030
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
BERGENS TIDENDE & OTHERS v. Norway
BERGENS TIDENDE OTHERS v. Norway NOR 02/08/2000 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper and its two editors being convicted in civil defamation proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-177
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway NOR 20/05/1999 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper company and its editor being convicted in civil defamation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-173
BODROZIC v. Serbia
BODROZIC v. Serbia SRB 10/12/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 15:36:53 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to criminal sanctions for defamation imposed on journalists. Article 10 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8751
DALBAN v. Romania
DALBAN v. Romania ROU 28/09/1999 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Freedom of expression protection of private and family life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Criminal convictions of journalists for insult and/or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15961
DE LESQUEN DU PLESSIS-CASSO v. France
DE LESQUEN DU PLESSIS CASSO v. France FRA 12/07/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s criminal conviction for public defamation of a deputy mayor during a municipal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33303
EERIKAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland
EERIKAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 13/03/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to freedom of expression due to criminal or civil convictions between 2000 and 2011 for invading the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5968
GAVRILOVICI v. the Republic of Moldova
GAVRILOVICI v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 15/03/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interferences by domestic courts on account of the applicants convictions for defamation or public protest without EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6840
GHIULFER PREDESCU v. Romania
GHIULFER PREDESCU v. Romania ROU 27/09/2017 00:00:00 12/10/2017 16:39:24 Case Description: This group of cases concerns unjustified interferences with the freedom of expression as a result of court decisions delivered in 2008 and 2017 respectively holding EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47937
GORELISHVILI v. Georgia
GORELISHVILI v. Georgia GEO 05/09/2007 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:08:10 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Conviction of a journalist to pay a fine for defamation having published an article on a political personality s financial situation of in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3347
ISIKIRIK v. Turkey
ISIKIRIK v. Turkey TUR 09/04/2018 00:00:00 23/05/2018 15:49:31 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having expressed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49517
JEAN-JACQUES MOREL v. France
JEAN JACQUES MOREL v. France FRA 10/01/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:01:18 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation of a municipal councillor to pay a fine and compensation after having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28467
KANELLOPOULOU v. Greece
KANELLOPOULOU v. Greece GRC 31/03/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 15:44:49 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the criminal convictions imposed on the applicants for malicious defamation defamation or insult following EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15168
KATRAMI v. Greece
KATRAMI v. Greece GRC 06/03/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of the applicants freedom of expression due to the criminal convictions imposed on them for insult Article 361 Criminal Code defamation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15699
KYDONIS v. Greece
KYDONIS v. Greece GRC 02/07/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 15:42:05 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interferences due to journalists and publishers criminal convictions imposed for defamation or insult. Article 10 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15126
L.P. AND CARVALHO v. Portugal
L.P. AND CARVALHO v. Portugal PRT 08/10/2019 00:00:00 14/10/2019 17:04:30 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the conviction of two lawyers for defamation L.P. and for attacking a person s honour Carvalho in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52983