Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 81 - 100 of 215
J.B. v. the Czech Republic
J.B. v. the Czech Republic CZE 21/10/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of a possibility to cross examine several witnesses in criminal proceedings for trafficking in human beings and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6328
JANATUINEN v. Finland
JANATUINEN v. Finland FIN 08/03/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of equality of arms and the breach of the applicant s right to adequate facilities for the preparation of his defence due to the destruction by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5988
JOSEF FISCHER v. Austria
JOSEF FISCHER v. Austria AUT 17/04/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to end effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings before the Supreme Court concerning the applicant s plea of nullity as the General Attorney EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-861
KADIKIS v. Latvia
KADIKIS v. Latvia LVA 04/08/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:33:38 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Degrading treatment resulting from the conditions administrative detention in Liepaja State Police short term detention facility Jelgava EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31210
KAKOULLI v. Turkey
KAKOULLI v. Turkey TUR 22/02/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: The Kakoulli group concerns the killings of two Greek Cypriot men in 1996 due to excessive use of firearms by Turkish or Turkish Cypriot military security forces along the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37260
KARTVELISHVILI v. Georgia
KARTVELISHVILI v. Georgia GEO 07/09/2018 00:00:00 17/09/2018 18:20:12 Case Description: These cases concern violation of the applicants right to a fair trial due to their inability during the criminal trials in 2007 2012 to obtain the attendance of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50219
KATRITSCH v. France
KATRITSCH v. France FRA 04/02/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Infringement of the right to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of one s defence and of assistance by a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33079
KAY AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom
KAY AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom GBR 21/12/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Impossibility for the applicants to challenge the proportionality of decisions to terminate their leases for state EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2903
KAYA v. Turkey
KAYA v. Turkey TUR 23/06/2020 00:00:00 26/06/2020 17:36:01 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to freedom of expression on account of his conviction under Article 215 of the Criminal Code for offering a mark of respect EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55431
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
KESKIN v. the Netherlands
KESKIN v. the Netherlands NLD 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: These cases concern the domestic courts refusal to allow the applicant defendants to cross examine prosecution witnesses whose statements were used as evidence in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57461
KHARCHENKO v. Ukraine
KHARCHENKO v. Ukraine UKR 10/05/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawfulness and length of pre trial detention and of inadequate review procedures due to deficiencies in legislation and its EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31352
KIRAKOSYAN v. Armenia
KIRAKOSYAN v. Armenia ARM 04/05/2009 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:33:58 Case Description: Poor conditions of administrative detention without adequate time and facilities to prepare any defence and without any right of appeal. Status of Execution: The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-395
KISS MENCZEL v. Hungary
KISS MENCZEL v. Hungary HUN 09/06/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: The case concerns the applicant s conviction in a trial where a witness whose deposition was decisive for the outcome of the case failed to appear for examination by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55359
KORNAKOVS v. Latvia
KORNAKOVS v. Latvia LVA 15/09/2006 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: The case has been closed. You can access the final resolution via the case documents tab . Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: Just EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12618
KORNEV AND KARPENKO v. Ukraine
KORNEV AND KARPENKO v. Ukraine UKR 21/01/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair administrative responsibility proceedings due to the lack of adequate time and facilities for the preparation of the second EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31130
KOTILAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland
KOTILAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 17/12/2020 00:00:00 12/01/2021 13:34:45 Case Description: Right to life: Lack of police compliance with their duty of diligence on account of their failure to preventively confiscate a gun from a student whose internet EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56529
KYPRIANOU v. Cyprus
KYPRIANOU v. Cyprus CYP 15/12/2005 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:41:38 Case Description: Unfair criminal proceedings: Lack of impartiality of a tribunal sentencing the applicant an advocate to 5 days imprisonment in 2001 for contempt of court while he was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12607
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
LAAKSONEN v. Finland
LAAKSONEN v. Finland FIN 12/07/2007 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the applicants right to be informed about the charges in criminal proceedings and to prepare their defence as well EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4876