Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 161 - 180 of 215
PLONKA v. Poland
PLONKA v. Poland POL 30/06/2009 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:14:57 Case Description: Denial of a fair trial: the applicant s initial confession made in the absence of a lawyer had a bearing on her conviction while there was no evidence of her having expressly EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39862
PLOTNICOVA v. the Republic of Moldova
PLOTNICOVA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 15/08/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Violation of the applicant s right to a fair hearing in criminal proceedings against her lasting from 2003 06 on two accounts: absence of any decision by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7156
POPOV v. Russia
POPOV v. Russia RUS 11/12/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the lack of medical assistance provided to detainees suffering from grave acute or chronic health conditions both in pre trial detention centres and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14118
PUTINTSEVA v. Russia
PUTINTSEVA v. Russia RUS 10/08/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Right to life / Action of security forces: Failure to protect the right to life of the applicant s son who was shot dead in 2002 in an attempt to escape the military unit EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13853
ROCHE v. the United Kingdom
ROCHE v. the United Kingdom GBR 19/10/2005 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life access to information: Absence of an effective and accessible procedure enabling the applicant s access to all relevant and appropriate EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2508
SAMOILA AND CIONCA v. Romania
SAMOILA AND CIONCA v. Romania ROU 04/06/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to bring arrested applicants promptly before the judge refusal of competent court to review the lawfulness of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16653
SANNINO v. Italy
SANNINO v. Italy ITA 13/09/2006 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to lacking effective defence or representation of the applicant accused of fraudulent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44493
SANTA CRUZ RUIZ v. the United Kingdom
SANTA CRUZ RUIZ v. the United Kingdom GBR 25/11/1998 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful detention based on an ultra vires Magistrates Court order EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2456
SANTARE AND LABAZNIKOVS v. Latvia
SANTARE AND LABAZNIKOVS v. Latvia LVA 30/06/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Protection of correspondence: Arbitrary interference due to covert interception in of telephone conversations in the framework of the criminal proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12674
SARBAN v. the Republic of Moldova
SARBAN v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 04/01/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: These cases primarily concern violations of the rights to liberty and security arising from: 1 Article 5 1: detention not based on reasonable suspicion Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6712
SAVINSKIY v. Ukraine
SAVINSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 28/05/2006 00:00:00 07/11/2016 14:16:38 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Quashing of a final judgment in criminal proceedings under the supervisory review protest procedure. Article 6 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26162
SCHATSCHASCHWILI v. Germany
SCHATSCHASCHWILI v. Germany DEU 15/12/2015 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:24:56 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings for aggravated robbery due to inability to examine or to have examined by counsel absent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38232
SCHOPS v. Germany
SCHOPS v. Germany DEU 13/02/2001 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Infringement of the principle of equality of arms in proceedings concerning the lawfulness of the applicant s detention on remand due to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38312
SEBALJ v. Croatia
SEBALJ v. Croatia HRV 28/09/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful detention after expiration of the maximum statutory period prescribed for in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10107
SEDLETSKA v. Ukraine
SEDLETSKA v. Ukraine UKR 01/07/2021 00:00:00 06/08/2021 16:42:52 Case Description: The case concerns an interference with the journalist s right to the protection of her sources in 2018 due to judicially authorised access to her mobile telephone EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58305
SELIVERSTOV v. Russia
SELIVERSTOV v. Russia RUS 25/12/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Unfairness of criminal proceedings on account of the recharacterisation of the applicants offences by the prosecutor and by the appeal court without providing them with an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13667
SERGEY SHEVCHENKO v. Ukraine
SERGEY SHEVCHENKO v. Ukraine UKR 04/07/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases concerns death during military service. In both cases the Court found a violation of the procedural limb of Article 2 on account of the failure EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31340
SHANNON v. Latvia
SHANNON v. Latvia LVA 24/02/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:33:08 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure by a regional court to examine promptly appeals against the extension of remand in custody. Status of Execution: The applicant was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31183
SHMORGUNOV AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
SHMORGUNOV AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 21/04/2021 00:00:00 11/05/2021 15:56:40 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns multiple violations during the Maidan protests in Kyiv and other cities in Ukraine in 2013 2014 either by State or by non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57585
SLAVGORODSKI v. Estonia
SLAVGORODSKI v. Estonia EST 12/12/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:56:21 Case Description: Protection of private life / correspondence: Disproportionate interference due to the opening of the applicant s correspondence in particular by the European Commission EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3055