Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 21 - 40 of 363
ALICAN DEMIR v. Turkey
ALICAN DEMIR v. Turkey TUR 25/05/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Delay in the domestic court s decision on a detainee s conditional release 20 days after he had fulfilled all conditions and lack of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37348
ALPAY v. Turkey
ALPAY v. Turkey TUR 27/02/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the authorities delay in paying the applicants additional compensation for the expropriation between the applicable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28629
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ANATOLIY MARINOV v. Bulgaria
ANATOLIY MARINOV v. Bulgaria BGR 15/05/2022 00:00:00 02/06/2022 14:41:20 Case Description: These cases concern the impossibility for the applicants to vote in parliamentary elections or in elections to the European Parliament between 2009 and 2019 because EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60403
ANTONETTO v. Italy
ANTONETTO v. Italy ITA 20/10/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:43:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Denial of a fair trial due to the failure to enforce of a judicial decision ordering the demolition EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45092
ANTONOV v. Bulgaria
ANTONOV v. Bulgaria BGR 28/08/2020 00:00:00 09/09/2020 09:40:56 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Unjustified interference due to tax authorities delay in enforcing final domestic judgments and refunding sums unduly collected. Article 1 of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55831
ARISTIMUNO MENDIZABAL v. France
ARISTIMUNO MENDIZABAL v. France FRA 17/04/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Unlawful interference due to the delay of 14 years taken by the authorities to issue to a citizen of a member state of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33179
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
ASSOCIATION '21 DECEMBRE 1989' AND OTHERS v. Romania
ASSOCIATION 21 DECEMBRE 1989 AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 28/11/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases mainly 1 concern the criminal investigations carried out since the early 1990s into violent crackdowns on anti governmental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13065
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS & EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3669
ATATUR AND PAMIR v. Turkey
ATATUR AND PAMIR v. Turkey TUR 14/01/2000 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:30:19 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation awarded by the domestic courts for the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26772
ATO v. Turkey
ATO v. Turkey TUR 08/09/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Administration s delay in paying additional compensation for the expropriation of land. Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Status of Execution: General measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-29369
AVAKEMYAN v. Armenia
AVAKEMYAN v. Armenia ARM 30/03/2017 00:00:00 30/01/2018 15:07:59 Case Description: This group of four cases concerns the non enforcement or delayed enforcement of final domestic judgments adopted in favour of the applicants notably concerning property EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46455
AZAS v. Greece
AZAS v. Greece GRC 21/05/2003 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Protection of property: Several procedural shortcomings or relating to compensation in the context of land expropriation proceedings. Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22222
B.A.C. v. Greece
B.A.C. v. Greece GRC 13/01/2017 00:00:00 04/04/2017 15:59:50 Case Description: The case concerned the failure by the Greek authorities to decide on an asylum application lodged by the applicant for more than twelve years. The Court held that the above EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46537
B.T. v. Turkey
B.T. v. Turkey TUR 14/11/2000 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the authorities delay in paying the applicants remainders of compensation awarded by the domestic courts for the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28537
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BARSOVA v. Russia
BARSOVA v. Russia RUS 22/10/2019 00:00:00 25/10/2019 16:33:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54105