Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 18 of 18
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
BUSHBM-PLYUS, TOV v. Ukraine
BUSHBM PLYUS TOV v. Ukraine UKR 06/06/2019 00:00:00 12/06/2019 17:29:15 Case Description: Functioning of justice and protection of property rights: Infringement of the principle of legal certainty in a dispute between the applicant company and the State EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52139
CYPRUS v. Turkey
CYPRUS v. Turkey TUR 10/05/2001 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: The case concerns 14 violations in relation to the situation in the northern part of Cyprus since the military intervention by Turkey in July and August 1974 concerning: Greek EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37128
DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. France
DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. France FRA 13/12/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:01:18 Case Description: Protection of family life and effective remedy: Lack of an effective remedy for a Brazilian national who was removed from French Guiana an overseas EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28442
H.P. AND OTHERS v. Croatia
H.P. AND OTHERS v. Croatia HRV 19/05/2022 00:00:00 20/05/2022 13:17:17 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicants right to respect for their family life resulting from the Zagreb County Court s 2018 decision which lacked sufficient EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60325
LACATUS v. Switzerland
LACATUS v. Switzerland CHE 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: Interference with private life: imposition of a fine in 2014 on a vulnerable Roma person for having begged followed by imprisonment for five days for non payment EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57455
LINGURAR v. Romania
LINGURAR v. Romania ROU 16/04/2019 00:00:00 25/04/2019 11:23:50 Case Description: The case concerns the disproportionate use of force against the applicants during a police raid on a Roma 1 community in 2011 an operation found by the Court to disclose EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51929
MATUSHEVSKYY AND MATUSHEVSKA v. Ukraine
MATUSHEVSKYY AND MATUSHEVSKA v. Ukraine UKR 23/09/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Death of a detainee the applicants son in a pre trial detention centre in 2008 from bodily injuries and the authorities failure to effectively EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32276
NASR AND GHALI v. Italy
NASR AND GHALI v. Italy ITA 23/05/2016 00:00:00 30/01/2018 12:28:48 Case Description: The case concerns violations arising from an extraordinary rendition operation against the first applicant an Egyptian cleric suspected of terrorism related offences EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28282
OPUZ v. Turkey
OPUZ v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the authorities to protect women the applicants or their female relatives from domestic violence despite having been reasonably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37222
PISKIN v. Turkey
PISKIN v. Turkey TUR 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to a fair trial on account of the failure of the national courts to conduct an in depth thorough examination of the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57513
R.R. v. Poland
R.R. v. Poland POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20596
SAN ARGIMIRO ISASA v. Spain
SAN ARGIMIRO ISASA v. Spain ESP 28/12/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 09:41:36 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Failure to carry out an in depth and effective investigation into arguable allegations of ill treatment during arrest and detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5742
TETE v. France
TETE v. France FRA 26/07/2020 00:00:00 21/08/2020 16:51:54 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s criminal conviction for malicious falsehoods on account of an open letter which he had written to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55749
TYSIAC v. Poland
TYSIAC v. Poland POL 24/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20592
V.D. v. Romania
V.D. v. Romania ROU 28/06/2010 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Inhuman and degrading treatment in prison due to the failure to provide a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13083
VELIKOVA v. Bulgaria
VELIKOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 04/10/2000 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern mainly deaths ill treatment including torture and lack of timely medical assistance during arrest in police detention or in penitentiary facilities and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3593