Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 181 - 200 of 280
NAVALNYY v. Russia
NAVALNYY v. Russia RUS 15/11/2018 00:00:00 22/11/2018 10:36:08 Case Description: The Navalnyy and Ofitserov case concerns the criminal conviction in 2013 of Mr Aleksey Navalnyy a political activist opposition leader anti corruption campaigner and popular EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50807
NAVALNYY v. Russia (no. 2)
NAVALNYY v. Russia no. 2 RUS 09/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: The Navalnyy and Ofitserov case concerns the criminal conviction in 2013 of Mr Aleksey Navalnyy a political activist opposition leader anti corruption campaigner and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52759
NAVALNYYE v. Russia
NAVALNYYE v. Russia RUS 05/03/2018 00:00:00 20/03/2018 16:34:47 Case Description: The Navalnyy and Ofitserov case concerns the criminal conviction in 2013 of Mr Aleksey Navalnyy a political activist opposition leader anti corruption campaigner and popular EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49187
NAYDYON v. Ukraine
NAYDYON v. Ukraine UKR 14/01/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: These cases concern the authorities failure to provide prisoners with effective access to the documents from their case files needed to substantiate their applications before EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31118
NEDESCU v. Romania
NEDESCU v. Romania ROU 16/04/2018 00:00:00 15/03/2019 16:06:37 Case Description: The case concerns the continuing impossibility for the applicants to recover their frozen embryos seized by the prosecuting authorities in 2009 in a criminal investigation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49399
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey TUR 08/10/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37296
NESIC v. Montenegro
NESIC v. Montenegro MNE 09/09/2020 00:00:00 23/09/2020 10:56:42 Case Description: This case concerns an unlawful interference with the applicant s right to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions on account of deprivation of land he owned on the coast EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55927
NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine
NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31306
NOREIKIENE AND NOREIKA v. Lithuania
NOREIKIENE AND NOREIKA v. Lithuania LTU 24/02/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Protection of property: Significant disproportion between the compensation awarded for the deprivation of land by the authorities and the land s market value EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4349
OLEKSANDR VOLKOV v. Ukraine
OLEKSANDR VOLKOV v. Ukraine UKR 27/05/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns a number of issues related to the independence and impartiality of the judiciary. The Oleksandr Volkov case concerns four violations of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31281
OLIMP PRODUCERS' COOPERATIVE v. Armenia
OLIMP PRODUCERS COOPERATIVE v. Armenia ARM 30/07/2020 00:00:00 21/08/2020 16:51:54 Case Description: The case concerns the excessive length of administrative proceedings. The European Court could not find any fact or argument capable of justifying the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55741
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey TUR 30/06/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:41:27 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36806
OSHURKO v. Ukraine
OSHURKO v. Ukraine UKR 08/12/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The Oshurko case concerns the authorities failure to meet their positive obligations to protect the physical integrity of a detainee in the ITT and to provide adequate and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31616
OTEGI MONDRAGON AND OTHERS v. Spain
OTEGI MONDRAGON AND OTHERS v. Spain ESP 06/02/2019 00:00:00 25/02/2019 15:58:10 Case Description: The case concerns the criminal proceedings and conviction of the applicants on grounds of being members of the ETA terrorist organisation Bateragune case . EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51531
PANOVITS v. Cyprus
PANOVITS v. Cyprus CYP 11/03/2009 00:00:00 26/10/2016 17:40:39 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of legal assistance during police questioning the use of the applicant s confession obtained under police questioning at EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2034
PARASCINETI v. Romania
PARASCINETI v. Romania ROU 13/06/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern longstanding structural deficiencies linked to overcrowding and inadequate living conditions treatment and care afforded to patients and severe EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13027
PETRELLA v. Italy
PETRELLA v. Italy ITA 06/09/2021 00:00:00 23/09/2021 15:54:44 Case Description: The case concerned the length of the preliminary investigations between 2001 and 2007 in the context of criminal proceedings brought on the basis of a complaint by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58411
PETUKHOV v. Ukraine (no. 2)
PETUKHOV v. Ukraine no. 2 UKR 09/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: These cases 1 concern the systemic problem of the irreducibility of life sentences in Ukraine violations of Article 3 . Under Article 46 of the Convention in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52757
PETUKHOVA v. Russia
PETUKHOVA v. Russia RUS 02/08/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The applicant a resident of Moscow was allegedly suffering from a mental disorder and in August 2006 a court authorised her involuntary psychiatric examination. However the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13994
PICHUGIN v. Russia
PICHUGIN v. Russia RUS 18/03/2013 00:00:00 07/11/2016 10:37:05 Case Description: These cases 1 concern violations of the applicant s right to liberty and to a fair trial in the context of two sets of criminal proceedings which ended with his conviction on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-23422