Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 781 - 800 of 1176
O'HARA v. the United Kingdom
O HARA v. the United Kingdom GBR 16/01/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Lacking promptness for being brought before a judge upon arrest and the lack of availability of an enforceable right to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2558
O. v. Suisse
O. v. Suisse CHE 08/06/2001 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Lack of a review of the lawfulness of the applicant s custody by an independent judge due to the investigating judge s supervision by prosecuting EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4642
OCALAN v. Turkey
OCALAN v. Turkey TUR 12/06/2003 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Right to life protection against ill treatment and of rights in detention access to and efficient functioning of justice: Ill treatment due to the imposition on the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5524
OFERTA PLUS SRL v. the Republic of Moldova
OFERTA PLUS SRL v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 23/05/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property / Right to petition: Failure to enforce a judgment as well as subsequent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6804
OJCZYK v. Poland
OJCZYK v. Poland POL 17/05/2016 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:10:55 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / Conditions of detention: Inhuman and degrading treatment due to imprisonment in inadequate conditions particularly overcrowding and detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20582
OKHRIMENKO v. Ukraine
OKHRIMENKO v. Ukraine UKR 15/01/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Inhuman and degrading treatment due to handcuffing during in patient treatment of a detainee on remand in a disproportionate manner not EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32266
OLDHAM v. the United Kingdom
OLDHAM v. the United Kingdom GBR 26/12/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Inability for a discretionary prisoner to obtain a speedy judicial review of the lawfulness of the applicant s continued EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2554
OLEKSA v. Poland
OLEKSA v. Poland POL 12/07/2018 00:00:00 07/08/2018 10:05:42 Case Description: Conditions of detention / Protection against ill treatment: Inadequate prison conditions in in Mys owice Remand Centre and in Wojtkowice Prison. Article 3 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50017
OLEWNIK-CIEPLINSKA AND OLEWNIK v. Poland
OLEWNIK CIEPLINSKA AND OLEWNIK v. Poland POL 05/12/2019 00:00:00 17/12/2019 16:24:16 Case Description: A series of failures by the police and prosecution service in dealing with the kidnapping of the applicants brother/son between 2001 and 2003 when he EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54443
OLSZEWSCY v. Poland
OLSZEWSCY v. Poland POL 03/02/2016 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: Right to life in detention: Shortcomings of the investigation into the circumstances of the applicants son s death occurred after having been taken to a police station and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20628
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey TUR 30/06/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:41:27 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36806
ONOUFRIOU v. Cyprus
ONOUFRIOU v. Cyprus CYP 07/04/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 10:37:04 Case Description: Protection of private and family life and against ill treatment: Disproportionate and unlawful interference due to the limitation of visiting rights and monitoring of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3201
OPREA v. Romania
OPREA v. Romania ROU 10/03/2014 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Unlawful detention: Arrest by the border police and custody based on a warrant for the execution of a prison sentence which had been imposed in absentia and later revoked on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17570
OPREA v. Romania
OPREA v. Romania ROU 31/01/2023 00:00:00 03/02/2023 17:20:59 Case Description: The case concerns the unlawful detention of the applicant in 2016 due to the authorities lack of diligence to confirm that he had already served his conviction abroad and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62546
OPRIS v. Romania
OPRIS v. Romania ROU 23/09/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of rights in detention: Criminal conviction for drug trafficking following active incitement by State agents and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17589
OPUZ v. Turkey
OPUZ v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the authorities to protect women the applicants or their female relatives from domestic violence despite having been reasonably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37222
ORCHOWSKI v. Poland
ORCHOWSKI v. Poland POL 22/01/2010 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:20:29 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment/ Conditions of detention: Structural problem of inadequate detention conditions particularly overcrowding aggravated by factors such as the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39886
OREFICI v. Espagne
OREFICI v. Espagne ESP 16/09/1999 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:12:44 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of detention on remand. Article 5 3 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: Just EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3467
OSHURKO v. Ukraine
OSHURKO v. Ukraine UKR 08/12/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The Oshurko case concerns the authorities failure to meet their positive obligations to protect the physical integrity of a detainee in the ITT and to provide adequate and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31616
OSPINA VARGAS v. Italy
OSPINA VARGAS v. Italy ITA 14/01/2005 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference due to arbitrary monitoring of their correspondence during their detention due to shortcomings in the Prison EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43013