Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1121 - 1140 of 1176
VOOL AND TOOMIK v. Estonia
VOOL AND TOOMIK v. Estonia EST 29/06/2022 00:00:00 18/07/2022 12:59:58 Case Description: This case concerns the unjustified difference in treatment as concerns long term visits of the applicants as persons in pre trial detention between 2011 and 2016 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60753
VOSGIEN v. France
VOSGIEN v. France FRA 03/01/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:19:15 Case Description: Excessive length of detention on remand: Insufficient grounds to justify continued detention for four years and three months. Status of Execution: Just satisfaction paid. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33319
VOSKUIL v. the Netherlands
VOSKUIL v. the Netherlands NLD 22/02/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:15:35 Case Description: Protection of private life / Freedom of information / freedom of expression: Detention of a journalist as a measure aiming at disclosure of his journalistic sources EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5930
VOYKIN AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
VOYKIN AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 27/06/2018 00:00:00 24/07/2018 10:18:38 Case Description: The case concerns the ill treatment of the second applicant the wife of the first applicant namely during an altercation on the street in 2008 with an off duty EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49883
VRENCEV v. Serbia
VRENCEV v. Serbia SRB 23/12/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of detention in police custody failure to consider any alternative for detention on remand unlawfulness of detention on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7022
VYERENTSOV v. Ukraine
VYERENTSOV v. Ukraine UKR 11/07/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: The Vyerentsov group of cases concerns various violations of the applicants right to freedom of assembly violation of Article 11 . The Vyerentsov case concerns violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31279
W.A. v. Switzerland
W.A. v. Switzerland CHE 02/02/2022 00:00:00 22/02/2022 12:35:56 Case Description: This case concerns the applicant s subsequent preventive detention since 2010 after he had served his sentence violations of Articles 5 1 and 7 of the Convention and 4 1 of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59719
W.P. v. Germany
W.P. v. Germany DEU 06/01/2017 00:00:00 25/04/2017 09:13:52 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful preventive detention acknowledged by unilateral declaration of the government. Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46699
WAITE v. the United Kingdom
WAITE v. the United Kingdom GBR 10/03/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Lack of an oral hearing and an adversarial procedure before the Parole Board in proceedings concerning the revocation of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2660
WALASEK v. Poland
WALASEK v. Poland POL 18/10/2018 00:00:00 22/11/2018 10:36:08 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment conditions of detention: Detention for 28 days in an overcrowded cell. Article 3 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50831
WALCZAK v. Poland
WALCZAK v. Poland POL 09/07/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Unnecessary interference due to the authorities refusal of family visits by the applicant s wife during detention. Article 8 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55603
WATSON v. France
WATSON v. France FRA 16/09/1999 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Protection of private life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful interference due to the use of listening devices in the apartment of a third party EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33007
WATSON v. the United Kingdom
WATSON v. the United Kingdom GBR 10/06/1998 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Delay in reviewing the lawfulness of the applicant s detention after the expiry of his tariff of 15 years and impossibility to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2370
WEBER v. Switzerland
WEBER v. Switzerland CHE 26/10/2007 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawfulness of applicant s detention on remand on account of the risk that he might re offend due to the lack of an adequate legal basis EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4724
WENNER v. Germany
WENNER v. Germany DEU 01/12/2016 00:00:00 16/12/2016 17:05:58 Case Description: Failure of the respondent state to ensure that the health of the applicant a long term heroin addict without any realistic chance of overcoming addiction and having received EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45805
WIKTORKO v. Poland
WIKTORKO v. Poland POL 30/06/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Ill treatment in a sobering up centre and lack of an effective investigation Status of Execution: Reopening of investigation impossible due to prescription. In 2001 the 1982 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18273
WISSE v. France
WISSE v. France FRA 20/03/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Unlawful interference due to the recording of remand detainees conversations with their relatives in detention centres visiting rooms. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33245
WITEK v. Poland
WITEK v. Poland POL 11/04/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful placement in a psychiatric hospital on the basis of an expert opinion delayed ordering and examination by the district court of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-19105
WITOLD LITWA v. Poland
WITOLD LITWA v. Poland POL 04/04/2000 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Arbitrary detention in a sobering up centre. Article 5 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17757
WLOCH v. Poland
WLOCH v. Poland POL 22/01/2001 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and effective functioning of justice: Unlawful detention lack of adversarial principle in the review proceedings and excessive EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17769