Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 38
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. Turkey
ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: The Alparslan Altan group of cases concerns violations of the right to liberty and security in the immediate aftermath of the coup attempt on 15 July 2016 due to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52779
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine UKR 05/03/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns principally the failure of the domestic authorities to carry out effective investigations into allegations of medical negligence by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31636
ASSOCIATION FOR SOLIDARITY WITH JEHOVAH WITNESSES AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
ASSOCIATION FOR SOLIDARITY WITH JEHOVAH WITNESSES AND OTHERS v. TURKEY TUR 17/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to freedom of religion on account of the application of urban planning EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39509
AVAKEMYAN v. Armenia
AVAKEMYAN v. Armenia ARM 30/03/2017 00:00:00 30/01/2018 15:07:59 Case Description: This group of four cases concerns the non enforcement or delayed enforcement of final domestic judgments adopted in favour of the applicants notably concerning property EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46455
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594
DUBETSKA AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
DUBETSKA AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 10/05/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The cases concern the interference with the applicants right to respect for their home and private and family life Article 8 . In the Dubetska and others case the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31571
FATULLAYEV v. Azerbaijan
FATULLAYEV v. Azerbaijan AZE 04/10/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the right to freedom of expression violations of Article 10 of the applicant journalists due in particular in both cases to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1727
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/06/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: These cases concern disproportionate and unjustified interferences with the applicants right to respect for their private lives due to the indefinite retention of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55601
GOMI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
GOMI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 21/03/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to life on account of the lack of an effective investigation into the death of the applicants relatives the G mi and others EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37220
GUTSANOVI v. Bulgaria
GUTSANOVI v. Bulgaria BGR 15/01/2014 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: The majority of the cases in this group concern deaths torture ill treatment excessive use of force or lack of timely medical assistance during arrest in police detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3943
I.D. v. the Republic of Moldova
I.D. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:43:32 Case Description: This group of cases concerns poor material conditions of detention in establishments under the authority of the Ministries of the Interior and Justice and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13946
IGNATOV v. Ukraine
IGNATOV v. Ukraine UKR 15/03/2017 00:00:00 31/03/2017 16:56:44 Case Description: The cases of the Ignatov group concern structural problems relating to arrest and pre trial detention. They concern certain deficiencies in the legislation in particular the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46503
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary HUN 17/04/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group of cases concerns inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to the applicants poor conditions of detention both pre trial and post conviction resulting EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10809
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France FRA 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment suffered by 27 of the applicants due to prison overcrowding and poor conditions of their detention personal space of less EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55363
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia RUS 15/10/2002 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service FSIN EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14068
KHARCHENKO v. Ukraine
KHARCHENKO v. Ukraine UKR 10/05/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawfulness and length of pre trial detention and of inadequate review procedures due to deficiencies in legislation and its EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31352
KOLYADENKO AND OTHERS v. Russia
KOLYADENKO AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 09/07/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case concerns the failure by the State to discharge its positive obligation to protect lives in the context of a large scale flood in the area around the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14122
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213