Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 13 of 13
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
DOKIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
DOKIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 04/10/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 21:28:10 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of their property on account of their inability to repossess their pre war military EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3137
DZWONKOWSKI v. Poland
DZWONKOWSKI v. Poland POL 12/07/2007 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:14:57 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention/ right to life: Ill treatment inflicted by the police as well as in two cases death and unintentional killing by the police and lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39854
IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. Georgia
IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. Georgia GEO 12/08/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: These cases concern: degrading treatment of the applicants on account of abusive and humiliating police conduct motivated by homophobic and/or transphobic hatred EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5894
KATS AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KATS AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 18/03/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The Logvinenko and Isayev groups of cases concern the inadequacy of medical care in general and for infectious diseases drug addiction and physical disability in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31596
MAGO v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
MAGO v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 24/09/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:11:36 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of their property on account of their inability to repossess their pre war military EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3435
MERIT v. Ukraine
MERIT v. Ukraine UKR 30/06/2004 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These groups of cases pending before the Committee since 2004 and 2005 concern mainly the excessive length of civil Svetlana Naumenko group and criminal Merit group proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31316
NAYDYON v. Ukraine
NAYDYON v. Ukraine UKR 14/01/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: These cases concern the authorities failure to provide prisoners with effective access to the documents from their case files needed to substantiate their applications before EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31118
O'KEEFFE v. Ireland
O KEEFFE v. Ireland IRL 28/01/2014 00:00:00 26/10/2016 16:50:41 Case Description: The case concerns the responsibility of the Irish State for the sexual abuse of the applicant aged nine by a lay teacher LH in a National School in 1973. A prior complaint EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1946
SALAKHOV AND ISLYAMOVA v. Ukraine
SALAKHOV AND ISLYAMOVA v. Ukraine UKR 14/06/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of adequate medical assistance to the first applicant in pre trial detention found primarily due to the Government s failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32272
SVETLANA NAUMENKO v. Ukraine
SVETLANA NAUMENKO v. Ukraine UKR 30/03/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These groups of cases pending before the Committee since 2004 and 2005 concern mainly the excessive length of civil Svetlana Naumenko group and criminal Merit group EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31302
TARAK AND DEPE v. Turkey
TARAK AND DEPE v. Turkey TUR 09/07/2019 00:00:00 25/07/2019 16:37:20 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Arbitrary and arrest and police detention of an unaccompanied minor and later of his mother for questioning in the context of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52623
TKHELIDZE v. Georgia
TKHELIDZE v. Georgia GEO 08/10/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: These cases concern the State s failure to take preventive action with a view to protecting the applicants female relatives from domestic violence culminating in their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58703