Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 121 - 140 of 185
NAYDYON v. Ukraine
NAYDYON v. Ukraine UKR 14/01/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: These cases concern the authorities failure to provide prisoners with effective access to the documents from their case files needed to substantiate their applications before EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31118
NEDESCU v. Romania
NEDESCU v. Romania ROU 16/04/2018 00:00:00 15/03/2019 16:06:37 Case Description: The case concerns the continuing impossibility for the applicants to recover their frozen embryos seized by the prosecuting authorities in 2009 in a criminal investigation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49399
O.C.I. AND OTHERS v. Romania
O.C.I. AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 21/05/2019 00:00:00 28/05/2019 14:50:56 Case Description: The case concerns the failure of the domestic courts to take into account the grave risk of domestic violence when ordering in 2017 the second and third applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52122
O'KEEFFE v. Ireland
O KEEFFE v. Ireland IRL 28/01/2014 00:00:00 26/10/2016 16:50:41 Case Description: The case concerns the responsibility of the Irish State for the sexual abuse of the applicant aged nine by a lay teacher LH in a National School in 1973. A prior complaint EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1946
OLARU v. the Republic of Moldova
OLARU v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 28/10/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Structural problem highlighted by the Court applying the pilot judgment procedure: violations of the applicants right of access to a court and right to peaceful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7092
OLEKSANDR VOLKOV v. Ukraine
OLEKSANDR VOLKOV v. Ukraine UKR 27/05/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns a number of issues related to the independence and impartiality of the judiciary. The Oleksandr Volkov case concerns four violations of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31281
OPUZ v. Turkey
OPUZ v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the authorities to protect women the applicants or their female relatives from domestic violence despite having been reasonably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37222
ORSUS AND OTHERS v. Croatia
ORSUS AND OTHERS v. Croatia HRV 16/03/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Discrimination and right to education: Discriminatory treatment of Roma children in two primary schools in the Medimurje area due to the lack of objective and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10085
ORTHODOX OHRID ARCHDIOCESE v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
ORTHODOX OHRID ARCHDIOCESE v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 09/04/2018 00:00:00 19/07/2018 11:30:51 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicant associations right to freedom of association on account of the domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49857
OZERMAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
OZERMAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 20/01/2010 00:00:00 15/11/2016 17:34:29 Case Description: Unjustified interference with property: lack of compensation for expropriation of a plot partly considered as forest area and lack of effective remedy. Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38670
P., C. AND S. v. the United Kingdom
P. C. AND S. v. the United Kingdom GBR 16/10/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of family life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Interference due to the removal of the applicants child shortly after birth EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2670
PARASCINETI v. Romania
PARASCINETI v. Romania ROU 13/06/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern longstanding structural deficiencies linked to overcrowding and inadequate living conditions treatment and care afforded to patients and severe EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13027
PETRESCU v. Portugal
PETRESCU v. Portugal PRT 03/03/2020 00:00:00 20/03/2020 16:31:43 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicant due to overcrowding and poor material conditions in which he was detained during different periods EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54997
PETROVIC v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
PETROVIC v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 22/09/2017 00:00:00 03/10/2017 09:13:29 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of restitution proceedings before administrative bodies Article 6 1 Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47829
PIALOPOULOS AND OTHERS v. Greece (no. 2)
PIALOPOULOS AND OTHERS v. Greece no. 2 GRC 07/12/2017 00:00:00 16/01/2018 11:15:06 Case Description: Protection of property rights / functioning of justice / effective remedy: Authorities failure to settle the status of the applicants properties in terms EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48741
PIRON v. France
PIRON v. France FRA 14/02/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Excessive length of proceedings concerning the consolidation of parcels of land and thus interference EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33107
POTOMSKA AND POTOMSKI v. Poland
POTOMSKA AND POTOMSKI v. Poland POL 15/09/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: Since 1987 the applicants have been prevented from developing their plot of land following a decision to classify it as a historic monument on the grounds that a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20604
R.D. AND I.M.D. v. Romania
R.D. AND I.M.D. v. Romania ROU 12/10/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: These cases concern longstanding structural deficiencies linked to overcrowding and inadequate living conditions treatment and care afforded to patients and severe EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58659
R.R. v. Poland
R.R. v. Poland POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20596
R.V. AND OTHERS v. Italy
R.V. AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 18/10/2019 00:00:00 18/11/2019 16:25:04 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54201