Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 21 - 40 of 57
KATRAMI v. Greece
KATRAMI v. Greece GRC 06/03/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of the applicants freedom of expression due to the criminal convictions imposed on them for insult Article 361 Criminal Code defamation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15699
KAVERZIN v. Ukraine
KAVERZIN v. Ukraine UKR 15/08/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31569
KHADIJA ISMAYILOVA v. Azerbaijan
KHADIJA ISMAYILOVA v. Azerbaijan AZE 10/04/2019 00:00:00 04/07/2019 17:16:59 Case Description: The application No. 65286/13 concerns violations of the rights of the applicant a renowned investigative journalist to respect for her private life and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52409
KOMMERSANT MOLDOVY v. the Republic of Moldova
KOMMERSANT MOLDOVY v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 09/04/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interference on account of the Economic Court s order to close a newspaper on the grounds that certain articles EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6770
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
L.R. v. North Macedonia
L.R. v. North Macedonia MKD 23/05/2020 00:00:00 04/06/2020 19:55:36 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Failure to secure the dignity and well being of a child with a mental disability on account of his inappropriate placement in an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55289
LACATUS v. Switzerland
LACATUS v. Switzerland CHE 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: Interference with private life: imposition of a fine in 2014 on a vulnerable Roma person for having begged followed by imprisonment for five days for non payment EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57455
LEVINTA v. the Republic of Moldova
LEVINTA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 16/03/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of cases concerns mainly inhuman treatment or torture in police custody including with a view to extracting confessions lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7162
M.S. v. the United Kingdom
M.S. v. the United Kingdom GBR 03/08/2012 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Police custody of a mentally ill person without appropriate psychiatric treatment due to co ordination difficulties between the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2921
MALENKO v. Ukraine
MALENKO v. Ukraine UKR 19/05/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and conditions of detention: Degrading treatment due to regular strip searches as well as overcrowding bad nutrition and insufficient medical EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31122
MARCHENKO v. Ukraine
MARCHENKO v. Ukraine UKR 19/05/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the conviction for defamation and the sentencing of a civil servant to a suspended prison term for publicly EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31585
MATKO v. Slovenia
MATKO v. Slovenia SVN 02/02/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:49 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Ill treatment at the hand of police and lack of effective investigations into the allegations. Article 3 substantive and procedural limb EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6468
MYRSKYY v. Ukraine
MYRSKYY v. Ukraine UKR 20/08/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Failure of domestic courts to give relevant and sufficient reasons for findings that certain critical statements made by the applicants were EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31524
N. v. Romania (no. 2)
N. v. Romania no. 2 ROU 16/02/2022 00:00:00 03/03/2022 15:55:23 Case Description: These cases concern deficiencies in the legal protection system for adults with intellectual disabilities or with mental health conditions substantive violation of Article 2 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59831
OGANEZOVA v. Armenia
OGANEZOVA v. Armenia ARM 17/08/2022 00:00:00 02/09/2022 10:09:44 Case Description: This case concerns an aggressive homophobic campaign against the applicant a well known member of the lesbian gay bisexual and transgender LGBT community in Armenia EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60993
PEREVEDENTSEVY v. Russia
PEREVEDENTSEVY v. Russia RUS 13/10/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This case concerns the failure by the domestic authorities to protect the life of the applicants son suicide during his mandatory military service in 2003 2004 and to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13940
PETRENCO v. the Republic of Moldova
PETRENCO v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 04/10/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to the domestic courts failure to protect the applicant s reputation when assessing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6834
POPOV v. Russia
POPOV v. Russia RUS 11/12/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the lack of medical assistance provided to detainees suffering from grave acute or chronic health conditions both in pre trial detention centres and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14118
PRANJIC-M-LUKIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
PRANJIC M LUKIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 02/09/2020 00:00:00 03/12/2020 16:50:01 Case Description: This case concerns the authorities interference with the applicant s right to respect for his private life due to his subjection in 2013 to involuntary EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56345
RACHWALSKI AND FERENC v. Poland
RACHWALSKI AND FERENC v. Poland POL 28/10/2009 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:14:57 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and of family and home: Degrading treatment by the police when determining the owner of an unlocked car parked in front of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39856