Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 17 of 17
A.H. AND OTHERS v. Russia
A.H. AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 07/03/2017 00:00:00 11/08/2017 14:38:41 Case Description: The case concerns the unlawful discriminatory treatment of prospective adoptive parents holding US nationality on account of the application of a 2012 law which banned EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47541
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The group of cases Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicants right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans on the holding of gay EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14136
ANAGNOSTAKIS AND OTHERS v. Greece
ANAGNOSTAKIS AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 23/12/2021 00:00:00 20/01/2022 18:20:37 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to respect for their family life due to the unreasonably delayed proceedings concerning in Anagnostakis EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59399
B.S. v. Spain
B.S. v. Spain ESP 24/10/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 09:41:36 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and discrimination: Lack of effective investigation into allegations of racially motivated ill treatment inflicted by police agents. Article 3 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5760
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: The case of Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans over a period of three EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48317
BEIAN v. Romania
BEIAN v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:30:01 Case Description: Unfairness of civil proceedings: Inconsistency in the domestic courts case law absence of a mechanism ensuring uniform interpretation of applicable legal provision and case law EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17421
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania LTU 14/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 16:56:20 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of the law enforcement agencies due to their discriminatory attitudes to launch an investigation into the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55375
CEGOLEA v. Romania
CEGOLEA v. Romania ROU 24/07/2020 00:00:00 21/08/2020 16:51:54 Case Description: In Romania the Constitution reserves one seat in the Chamber of Deputies to each national minority whose organisations do not attain the electoral threshold. This case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55723
CUSAN AND FAZZO v. Italy
CUSAN AND FAZZO v. Italy ITA 07/04/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of private and family life: Impossibility under domestic law to register a married couple s legitimate child at birth in the civil EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28246
HORVATH AND KISS v. Hungary
HORVATH AND KISS v. Hungary HUN 29/04/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: The case concerns discrimination against the applicants born in 1994 and 1992 respectively who are of Roma 1 origin on account of their placement in a special school EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10905
MITZINGER v. Germany
MITZINGER v. Germany DEU 09/05/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: The case concerns discriminatory interference with the applicant s right to respect for her family life in that born out of wedlock in 1940 in the former German Democratic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47113
OPUZ v. Turkey
OPUZ v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the authorities to protect women the applicants or their female relatives from domestic violence despite having been reasonably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37222
SALGUEIRO SILVA MOUTA v. Portugal
SALGUEIRO SILVA MOUTA v. Portugal PRT 21/03/2000 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Protection of family life / discrimination: Interference and discriminatory treatment of the applicant on account of the domestic courts decision conferring on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9381
SPORER v. Austria
SPORER v. Austria AUT 03/05/2011 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Discriminatory treatment during custody proceedings of fathers of children born out of wedlock: difference in treatment as regards the judicial scrutiny in the attribution of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1081
T.M. AND C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova
T.M. AND C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 28/04/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:25:58 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the authorities failure to comply with their positive obligations under Article 3 on account of the manner of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14229
WOLTER AND SARFERT v. Germany
WOLTER AND SARFERT v. Germany DEU 23/06/2017 00:00:00 12/07/2017 17:01:36 Case Description: Discriminatory interference with the right to protection of property in that the applicants born out of wedlock in 1943 and 1940 respectively were unable to assert EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47447