Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 27
CITRARO AND MOLINO v. Italy
CITRARO AND MOLINO v. Italy ITA 04/06/2020 00:00:00 04/06/2020 19:55:36 Case Description: The case of Sy concerns the detention between December 2018 and May 2020 of the applicant who had a psychiatric condition aggravated by drug addiction in an ordinary EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55275
DILEK AND OTHERS v. Turkey
DILEK AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to freedom of association on account of the civil liability imposed on the applicants civil servants employed on fixed term EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37405
G.T. v. Greece
G.T. v. Greece GRC 13/03/2023 00:00:00 27/03/2023 08:53:55 Case Description: The case concerns the violation of the applicant s right to respect for his private and family life on account of the public prosecutor s rejection in 2016 of the former s urgent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62919
GAFGAZ MAMMADOV v. Azerbaijan
GAFGAZ MAMMADOV v. Azerbaijan AZE 14/03/2016 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: This group concerns numerous breaches of the applicants freedom of assembly through the dispersal of unauthorised peaceful demonstrations not posing any threat to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1743
HOALGA AND OTHERS v. Romania
HOALGA AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 15/06/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and of rights in detention actions of security forces: Disproportionate use of force by gendarmerie in an altercation and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13133
HORVATH AND KISS v. Hungary
HORVATH AND KISS v. Hungary HUN 29/04/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: The case concerns discrimination against the applicants born in 1994 and 1992 respectively who are of Roma 1 origin on account of their placement in a special school EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10905
I.M. v. Switzerland
I.M. v. Switzerland CHE 09/07/2019 00:00:00 25/07/2019 16:37:20 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / expulsion: Failure of authorities to demonstrate convincingly that the expulsion order issued against the convicted applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52627
KARABET AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KARABET AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 17/04/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern principally large scale violence against prisoners with the involvement of special forces rapid reaction units and prison staff either as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32113
KOMMERSANT MOLDOVY v. the Republic of Moldova
KOMMERSANT MOLDOVY v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 09/04/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interference on account of the Economic Court s order to close a newspaper on the grounds that certain articles EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6770
KUZNETSOV v. Ukraine
KUZNETSOV v. Ukraine UKR 29/04/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concern ill treatment between 1998 2008 by the prison staff and failure to carry out an effective investigation into these allegations violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31300
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
L. v. Lithuania
L. v. Lithuania LTU 31/03/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private life on account of the absence of implementing legislation to regulate the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4320
M v. Ukraine
M v. Ukraine UKR 19/07/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern a lack of proper and fair procedure for authorisation of admission and subsequent retention in the course of civil involuntary hospitalisation between 2000 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31581
NIKOLYAN v. Armenia
NIKOLYAN v. Armenia ARM 03/01/2020 00:00:00 12/02/2020 09:50:51 Case Description: The case concerns the declaration the applicant legally incapable in 2013 following proceedings brought by his wife and son. The Court found that the applicant could neither EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54709
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey TUR 05/03/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: This group concerns violations of the right to freedom of peaceful assembly including the prosecution of participants and/or the use of excessive force to disperse peaceful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37415
P. AND S. v. Poland
P. AND S. v. Poland POL 30/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20614
PETUKHOVA v. Russia
PETUKHOVA v. Russia RUS 02/08/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The applicant a resident of Moscow was allegedly suffering from a mental disorder and in August 2006 a court authorised her involuntary psychiatric examination. However the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13994
POLTORATSKIY v. Ukraine
POLTORATSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 29/04/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 13:48:08 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concern ill treatment between 1998 2008 by the prison staff and failure to carry out an effective investigation into these allegations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33455
R.R. v. Poland
R.R. v. Poland POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20596
ROCHE v. the United Kingdom
ROCHE v. the United Kingdom GBR 19/10/2005 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life access to information: Absence of an effective and accessible procedure enabling the applicant s access to all relevant and appropriate EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2508