Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 21 - 40 of 44
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
L. v. Lithuania
L. v. Lithuania LTU 31/03/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private life on account of the absence of implementing legislation to regulate the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4320
M v. Ukraine
M v. Ukraine UKR 19/07/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern a lack of proper and fair procedure for authorisation of admission and subsequent retention in the course of civil involuntary hospitalisation between 2000 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31581
MCLEOD v. the United Kingdom
MCLEOD v. the United Kingdom GBR 23/09/1998 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life and home: Disproportionated interference due to the police entry into the applicant s home to prevent breach of the peace without prior EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2426
NAWROT v. Poland
NAWROT v. Poland POL 05/03/2018 00:00:00 20/03/2018 16:34:47 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful detention in a psychiatric hospital due to the failure of domestic authorities to establish the persistence of a disorder of a kind EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49183
NIKOLYAN v. Armenia
NIKOLYAN v. Armenia ARM 03/01/2020 00:00:00 12/02/2020 09:50:51 Case Description: The case concerns the declaration the applicant legally incapable in 2013 following proceedings brought by his wife and son. The Court found that the applicant could neither EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54709
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey TUR 05/03/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: This group concerns violations of the right to freedom of peaceful assembly including the prosecution of participants and/or the use of excessive force to disperse peaceful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37415
P. AND S. v. Poland
P. AND S. v. Poland POL 30/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20614
PETUKHOVA v. Russia
PETUKHOVA v. Russia RUS 02/08/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The applicant a resident of Moscow was allegedly suffering from a mental disorder and in August 2006 a court authorised her involuntary psychiatric examination. However the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13994
PLESO v. Hungary
PLESO v. Hungary HUN 02/01/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to liberty and security due to his compulsory confinement to a psychiatric hospital from 27 March 2008 to 25 April 2008 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11102
POLTORATSKIY v. Ukraine
POLTORATSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 29/04/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 13:48:08 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concern ill treatment between 1998 2008 by the prison staff and failure to carry out an effective investigation into these allegations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33455
R.R. v. Poland
R.R. v. Poland POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20596
ROCHE v. the United Kingdom
ROCHE v. the United Kingdom GBR 19/10/2005 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life access to information: Absence of an effective and accessible procedure enabling the applicant s access to all relevant and appropriate EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2508
S.B.C. v. the United Kingdom
S.B.C. v. the United Kingdom GBR 19/09/2001 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Automatic pre trial detention under the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 and the lack of availability of an enforceable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2568
SARBAN v. the Republic of Moldova
SARBAN v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 04/01/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: These cases primarily concern violations of the rights to liberty and security arising from: 1 Article 5 1: detention not based on reasonable suspicion Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6712
SOLCAN v. Romania
SOLCAN v. Romania ROU 08/01/2020 00:00:00 12/02/2020 09:50:51 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities refusal to allow the applicant who is confined in a psychiatric facility as a security measure to attend her mother s funeral in 2013 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54705
STANEV v. Bulgaria
STANEV v. Bulgaria BGR 17/01/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: This case concerns the placement of the applicant subject to a partial guardianship order following a diagnosis of schizophrenia in a social care home. The Court found that EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3767
STEFAN STANKOV v. Bulgaria
STEFAN STANKOV v. Bulgaria BGR 17/06/2015 00:00:00 26/10/2016 15:12:04 Case Description: Right to liberty and security: Unlawful placement of the applicant suffering from a mental disorder in a social care home lack of judicial remedy to challenge the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1926
STRAZIMIRI v. Albania
STRAZIMIRI v. Albania ALB 21/05/2020 00:00:00 18/08/2020 10:08:56 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicant a person suffering from paranoid schizophrenia who was found not criminally liable for attempted EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55687
SY v. Italy
SY v. Italy ITA 24/04/2022 00:00:00 06/05/2022 12:33:12 Case Description: The case of Sy concerns the detention between December 2018 and May 2020 of the applicant who had a psychiatric condition aggravated by drug addiction in an ordinary prison despite EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60281