Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 20
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 28/11/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the retroactive application of Law No. 266/2005 to pending judicial proceedings concerning the approximately 310 applicants length of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28264
ERDEN v. Turkey
ERDEN v. Turkey TUR 23/06/2010 00:00:00 16/11/2016 09:33:08 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions due to annulment of property title and transfer to Treasury deprivation of property designated EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38708
FERNANDEZ AND OTHERS v. France
FERNANDEZ AND OTHERS v. France FRA 21/04/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:36:48 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with the right to the peaceful enjoyment of possessions: Failure to enforce expulsion measures ordered by courts in respect of land EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33337
GODLEVSKAYA v. Russia
GODLEVSKAYA v. Russia RUS 07/03/2022 00:00:00 24/03/2022 13:54:24 Case Description: Violation of the right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions on account of unlawful or disproportionate seizure of the applicants property following the criminal conviction EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60001
ISMAYILOV v. Russia
ISMAYILOV v. Russia RUS 04/06/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to the peaceful enjoyment of possessions on account of confiscatory measures during the criminal proceedings from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13769
JUCYS v. Lithuania
JUCYS v. Lithuania LTU 08/04/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to prolonged inability of an innocent owner to recover possessions seized in criminal proceedings furs despite EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4239
KHACHATRYAN v. Armenia
KHACHATRYAN v. Armenia ARM 01/03/2010 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:33:58 Case Description: Non enforcement of a final domestic judgment ordering a private company whose majority shareholder was the State to pay amounts to the applicants for salary arrears EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-415
KOSTIC v. Serbia
KOSTIC v. Serbia SRB 25/02/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 14:45:07 Case Description: The majority of these cases concerns violations of the applicants rights to access to a court where: i the authorities since 1996 failed to enforce or enforced with significant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8635
KRYVENKYY v. Ukraine
KRYVENKYY v. Ukraine UKR 16/05/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the deprivation of a bona fide owner of a land plot without any compensation or another type of appropriate EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47019
MEGADAT.COM SRL v. the Republic of Moldova
MEGADAT.COM SRL v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 08/07/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the violation of the applicant companies right to peaceful enjoyment of their possessions on account of arbitrary and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6814
MIHALEVI v. Bulgaria
MIHALEVI v. Bulgaria BGR 21/06/2018 00:00:00 29/06/2018 15:03:37 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference in the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions due to the loss of the possibility to obtain compensation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49751
S.C. CONTINENTAL HOTELS S.A. v. Romania
S.C. CONTINENTAL HOTELS S.A. v. Romania ROU 08/10/2019 00:00:00 14/10/2019 17:04:30 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate interference with the right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions of the applicant a privatised company as a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52979
S.C. TOTALGAZ INDUSTRIE S.R.L. v. Romania
S.C. TOTALGAZ INDUSTRIE S.R.L. v. Romania ROU 03/12/2019 00:00:00 09/12/2019 17:24:35 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant company s right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions due to the recalculation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54303
TANASOV v. Romania
TANASOV v. Romania ROU 31/10/2017 00:00:00 12/10/2018 15:40:34 Case Description: This case concerns a disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions on account of the confiscation of two silver ingots EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48093
TETU v. France
TETU v. France FRA 22/12/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 12:11:57 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of compulsory liquidation proceedings thus disproportionate infringement of the right to property on account of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33425
TODOROV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
TODOROV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 13/10/2021 00:00:00 21/05/2022 19:35:01 Case Description: This case concerns a disproportionate interference in 2011 and 2012 with the right to peaceful enjoyment of their possessions of the applicants Todorov and Others EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60335
TRAFIK OIL - 1 EOOD v. Bulgaria
TRAFIK OIL 1 EOOD v. Bulgaria BGR 18/05/2021 00:00:00 21/05/2021 14:55:48 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant company s right to the peaceful enjoyment of its possessions and the absence of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57639
UNSPED PAKET SERVISI SAN. VE TIC. A.S. v. Bulgaria
UNSPED PAKET SERVISI SAN. VE TIC. A.S. v. Bulgaria BGR 13/01/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant company s right to the peaceful enjoyment of its possessions as the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3914
URBARSKA OBEC TRENCIANSKE BISKUPICE v. Slovakia
URBARSKA OBEC TRENCIANSKE BISKUPICE v. Slovakia SVK 02/06/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate deprivation of possessions due to compulsory transfer of the applicant association s land to members of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8081
YAVASHEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
YAVASHEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 18/03/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions: Impossibility for the applicants to apply for compensation for a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14465