Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 561 - 580 of 723
SAVVIDES v. Cyprus
SAVVIDES v. Cyprus CYP 14/12/2021 00:00:00 16/12/2021 17:16:40 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Disproportionate hindrance in access to a court on account of the Family Court of Appeal s excessively formalistic refusal to examine the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59145
SAYGILI AND BILGIC v. Turkey
SAYGILI AND BILGIC v. Turkey TUR 20/08/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the closure of a newspaper for a period of 30 days which was erroneously considered to be the successor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37244
SCHARSACH AND NEWS VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT v. Austria
SCHARSACH AND NEWS VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT v. Austria AUT 13/02/2004 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the first applicant s conviction to a suspended fine and the media company s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-915
SCHEMBRI AND OTHERS v. Malta
SCHEMBRI AND OTHERS v. Malta MLT 10/02/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:13:19 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Inability to institute actions in expropriation proceedings before the Land Arbitration EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4091
SCHIRMER v. Poland
SCHIRMER v. Poland POL 21/12/2004 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to domestic courts refusal to order the eviction of the applicant s tenant on the grounds that the applicant had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18189
SCHLUMPF v. Switzerland
SCHLUMPF v. Switzerland CHE 05/06/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of private life: Unfair civil proceedings related to the reimbursement of sex change operation costs due to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4752
SCHOLZ AG v. Armenia
SCHOLZ AG v. Armenia ARM 24/01/2019 00:00:00 06/02/2019 16:55:17 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unjustified and disproportionate limitation of access to court due to the domestic courts failure to examine the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51369
SCHUTH v. Germany
SCHUTH v. Germany DEU 23/12/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 09:49:20 Case Description: Dismissal in 1998 of an organist in the Catholic church for having engaged in an extra marital relationship: disproportionate interference with private life on account of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36554
SCHWABE v. Germany
SCHWABE v. Germany DEU 01/03/2012 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Unlawful preventive five day detention to prevent participation in anti G8 demonstration: Disproportionate interference with the right to assembly to avoid the possible EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38500
SCOZZARI v. Italy
SCOZZARI v. Italy ITA 13/07/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to the placement of the applicants children in State care in a specific community and failure by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43147
SEDLETSKA v. Ukraine
SEDLETSKA v. Ukraine UKR 01/07/2021 00:00:00 06/08/2021 16:42:52 Case Description: The case concerns an interference with the journalist s right to the protection of her sources in 2018 due to judicially authorised access to her mobile telephone EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58305
SEKMADIENIS LTD. v. Lithuania
SEKMADIENIS LTD. v. Lithuania LTU 30/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unnecessary and disproportionate interference due to the imposition of a fine on a commercial company by the State Consumer Rights EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49465
SEN v. the Netherlands
SEN v. the Netherlands NLD 21/03/2002 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to the refusal to grant a residence permit to a daughter who had remained in her birth country to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4473
SEPCZYNSKI v. Poland
SEPCZYNSKI v. Poland POL 26/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment conditions of detention protection of property: Inadequate medical care in prison disproportionate interference due to the imposition of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49467
SERGEY VOLOSYUK v. Ukraine
SERGEY VOLOSYUK v. Ukraine UKR 12/06/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: These cases concern the unlawful interference with the applicants right to respect for their correspondence with various official bodies and institutions both while EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31112
SERIF v. Greece
SERIF v. Greece GRC 14/03/2000 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Freedom of religion: Disproportionate interference due to the convictions of the applicants who had been elected as muftis by part of the Muslim Greek community for usurping the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22180
SEVDARI v. Albania
SEVDARI v. Albania ALB 13/03/2023 00:00:00 27/03/2023 08:53:55 Case Description: The case concerns the disproportionate dismissal following a vetting procedure re evaluation of the credentials of a prosecutor and a lifetime ban from re entering the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62937
SEZEN v. the Netherlands
SEZEN v. the Netherlands NLD 01/07/2006 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference due to refusal of authorities to extend a husband s residence permit with the consequence of splitting up a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4513
SHAHANOV AND PALFREEMAN v. Bulgaria
SHAHANOV AND PALFREEMAN v. Bulgaria BGR 21/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to disciplinary punishment of prisoners respectively to ten days of solitary confinement or three EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39555
SHAMOYAN v. Armenia
SHAMOYAN v. Armenia ARM 07/10/2015 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:33:58 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: The procedural requirement that appeals on points of law could only be lodged by advocates licensed to act before the Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-467