Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 2961 - 2980 of 3077
WITOLD LITWA v. Poland
WITOLD LITWA v. Poland POL 04/04/2000 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Arbitrary detention in a sobering up centre. Article 5 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17757
WIZERKANIUK v. Poland
WIZERKANIUK v. Poland POL 05/10/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the criminal conviction of a chief editor and co owner of a local newspaper for the publication of an interview EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20600
WLOCH v. Poland (no. 2)
WLOCH v. Poland no. 2 POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:26:58 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Refusal of a domestic court to grant compensation under the relevant provisions for the applicant s unlawful detention on remand. Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39929
WODITSCHKA v. Austria
WODITSCHKA v. Austria AUT 21/01/2005 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / discrimination on the ground of sex: Discriminatory treatment of a male homosexual sentenced to a fine or a suspended prison EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-985
WOJCIECHOWSKI v. Poland
WOJCIECHOWSKI v. Poland POL 05/06/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and efficient functioning of justice: Disregard of presumption of innocence due to the grounds used by courts to motivate decisions EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18649
WOJTAS-KALETA v. Poland
WOJTAS KALETA v. Poland POL 16/10/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Reprimand of a journalist by her employer Polish Public TV for having expressed in an interview and in an open letter her concerns about inter EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18347
WOKKE v. the Netherlands
WOKKE v. the Netherlands NLD 31/10/1998 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4467
WOLOSOWICZ v. Poland
WOLOSOWICZ v. Poland POL 12/07/2018 00:00:00 07/08/2018 10:05:42 Case Description: Conditions of detention / Protection against ill treatment: Inadequate prison conditions in Siedlce Prison in an overcrowded cells. Article 3 Status of Execution: Case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50023
WOMEN ON WAVES AND OTHERS v. Portugal
WOMEN ON WAVES AND OTHERS v. Portugal PRT 03/05/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the decision of the administrative authorities to prohibit the ship Borndiep which had been EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9671
WORWA v. Poland
WORWA v. Poland POL 14/06/2004 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unjustified interference due to the circumstances in which the applicant became subject to a series of psychiatric reports in criminal proceedings. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17755
WOS v. Poland
WOS v. Poland POL 08/09/2006 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of judicial review of decisions taken by the Polish German Reconciliation Foundation on the claims to compensate victims of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18441
WYNEN v. Belgium
WYNEN v. Belgium BEL 05/02/2003 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings infringement of the principle of equality of arms due to the Court of Cassation declaration of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1383
X AND Y v. Croatia
X AND Y v. Croatia HRV 03/02/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of private life: Denial of a fair hearing due to lack of procedural safeguards in proceedings divesting the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10109
X AND Y v. Romania
X AND Y v. Romania ROU 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private live on account of the absence of a clear and foreseeable legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57459
X v. Croatia
X v. Croatia HRV 01/12/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Exclusion of the applicants in the case of X the applicant was divested of her capacity to act while in the case of A.K. and L. the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10089
X v. Latvia
X v. Latvia LVA 26/11/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:49 Case Description: Failure to satisfy the procedural requirements inherent in the right to respect for private life due to refusal by domestic courts to examine the conclusions of a psychological EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31110
X v. Slovenia
X v. Slovenia SVN 28/09/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:49 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Authorities failure to exercise the required diligence in the proceedings concerning the withdrawal of the applicant s parental rights which EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7220
X v. Sweden
X v. Sweden SWE 09/04/2018 00:00:00 02/05/2018 10:26:22 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / expulsion: Risk of ill treatment in case of the applicant s deportation ordered by the Migration Agency and confirmed by the Migration Court to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49349
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CHE 26/04/2017 00:00:00 19/06/2017 16:05:34 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / deportation/asylum: Failure of authorities to sufficiently assess in asylum proceedings the risk of ill treatment if returned to Sri Lanka EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46933
X v. Turkey
X v. Turkey TUR 27/05/2013 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: Protection against discrimination / protection against ill treatment: Sustained discrimination and inhuman and degrading treatment on account of the homosexual applicant s detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37196