Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 17 of 17
DORNEANU v. Romania
DORNEANU v. Romania ROU 28/02/2018 00:00:00 16/03/2018 17:33:32 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman treatment suffered by the applicant an inmate afflicted with terminal prostate cancer. The European Court ruled that his continued detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49135
ISAYEV v. Ukraine
ISAYEV v. Ukraine UKR 28/08/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The Logvinenko and Isayev groups of cases concern the inadequacy of medical care in general and for infectious diseases drug addiction and physical disability in particular EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31324
KALANYOS AND OTHERS v. Romania
KALANYOS AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 26/07/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Discriminatory attacks and ensuing judicial proceedings: Destruction of houses of Roma villagers by local population the poor living conditions of the victims and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16105
KATS AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KATS AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 18/03/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The Logvinenko and Isayev groups of cases concern the inadequacy of medical care in general and for infectious diseases drug addiction and physical disability in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31596
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
LIU v. Russia (no. 2)
LIU v. Russia no. 2 RUS 03/08/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants exclusion on national security grounds from the Russian Federation in different time periods from 2004 to 2015 in violation of their right EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14148
LOGVINENKO v. Ukraine
LOGVINENKO v. Ukraine UKR 14/01/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: The Logvinenko and Isayev groups of cases concern the inadequacy of medical care in general and for infectious diseases drug addiction and physical disability in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31240
M v. Ukraine
M v. Ukraine UKR 19/07/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern a lack of proper and fair procedure for authorisation of admission and subsequent retention in the course of civil involuntary hospitalisation between 2000 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31581
NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine
NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31306
P. AND S. v. Poland
P. AND S. v. Poland POL 30/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20614
R.R. v. Poland
R.R. v. Poland POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20596
TSINTSABADZE v. Georgia
TSINTSABADZE v. Georgia GEO 18/03/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: This group of cases comprises 15 judgments concerning various substantive between 1999 and 2014 and procedural between 1999 and 2020 violations of Article 2 and Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5830
TYSIAC v. Poland
TYSIAC v. Poland POL 24/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20592
URBONAVICIUS v. Lithuania
URBONAVICIUS v. Lithuania LTU 21/05/2019 00:00:00 28/05/2019 14:50:56 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of Kaunas Remand Prison to allow the applicant an apnea medical device violation of Article 3 . Status of Execution: an action report EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52112
VELIKOVA v. Bulgaria
VELIKOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 04/10/2000 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern mainly deaths ill treatment including torture and lack of timely medical assistance during arrest in police detention or in penitentiary facilities and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3593
X v. Finland
X v. Finland FIN 19/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the involuntary confinement of the applicant for care in a mental hospital between 17 February 2005 and 27 January 2006 without sufficient safeguards against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5984
YOH-EKALE MWANJE v. Belgium
YOH EKALE MWANJE v. Belgium BEL 20/03/2012 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Protection against inhuman treatment against expulsion and lack of effective remedy: Inhuman and degrading treatment suffered by a Cameroonian national an illegal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1543