Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 13 of 13
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania LTU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 03/12/2018 15:46:42 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights on account of the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50865
AL NASHIRI v. Poland
AL NASHIRI v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20624
AL NASHIRI v. Romania
AL NASHIRI v. Romania ROU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 10/12/2018 09:38:46 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The European EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50873
C.G. AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
C.G. AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 24/07/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: The cases C.G. and Others Kurilovich and Others M. and Others and Bou Hassoun concern shortcomings in the procedure for judicial review of decisions to expel foreign EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3769
HUSAYN (ABU ZUBAYDAH) v. Poland
HUSAYN ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:10:55 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20584
KESKIN v. the Netherlands
KESKIN v. the Netherlands NLD 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: These cases concern the domestic courts refusal to allow the applicant defendants to cross examine prosecution witnesses whose statements were used as evidence in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57461
KRISTIANSEN v. Norway
KRISTIANSEN v. Norway NOR 18/03/2016 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to justifiable grounds on which to doubt the High Court s impartiality on account of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-219
KUDESHKINA v. Russia
KUDESHKINA v. Russia RUS 14/09/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to freedom of expression due to disciplinary proceedings leading to her dismissal in 2004 from judicial office for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13926
MIROSLAVA TODOROVA v. Bulgaria
MIROSLAVA TODOROVA v. Bulgaria BGR 19/01/2022 00:00:00 04/02/2022 11:30:26 Case Description: The case concerns disciplinary proceedings and sanctions in 2011 2015 imposed by the Supreme Judicial Council the SJC against the applicant a judge who in her EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59583
MOUSTAHI v. France
MOUSTAHI v. France FRA 25/09/2020 00:00:00 28/10/2020 12:05:36 Case Description: This case concerns the measures taken following the illegal entry into Mayotte French department in the Indian Ocean of the first applicant s children legally resident there EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56109
UMO ILINDEN AND IVANOV v. Bulgaria (II)
UMO ILINDEN AND IVANOV v. Bulgaria II BGR 18/01/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Interference with freedom of assembly of Macedonian minority organisations: prohibition of their meetings between 2004 and 2009 based on grounds which the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14435
VASSILIOS STAVROPOULOS v. Greece
VASSILIOS STAVROPOULOS v. Greece GRC 27/12/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Infringement of the principle of the presumption of innocence due to domestic courts expression of respective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15737
ZAICHENKO v. Ukraine (no. 2)
ZAICHENKO v. Ukraine no. 2 UKR 06/07/2015 00:00:00 07/11/2016 13:25:41 Case Description: This case concerns the applicant s involuntary hospitalization and confinement in psychiatric hospital in 2009 which were not protected by appropriate safeguards EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-25801