Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 41
AGGERHOLM v. Denmark
AGGERHOLM v. Denmark DNK 15/12/2020 00:00:00 09/02/2021 09:54:42 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman or degrading treatment in 2013 of a man suffering from paranoid schizophrenia who was strapped to a restraint bed in a psychiatric hospital EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56537
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine UKR 05/03/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns principally the failure of the domestic authorities to carry out effective investigations into allegations of medical negligence by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31636
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS & EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3669
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594
BARLETTA AND FARNETANO v. Italy
BARLETTA AND FARNETANO v. Italy ITA 26/03/2020 00:00:00 27/03/2020 17:50:04 Case Description: The Trapani group of cases formerly part of the Ceteroni group concerns the excessive length of proceedings before the civil courts violations of Article 6 1 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55019
BERKOVICH AND OTHERS v. Russia
BERKOVICH AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 27/06/2018 00:00:00 27/07/2018 11:01:47 Case Description: This case concerns the restrictions imposed in 2005 2013 on the right to travel abroad on account of the authorities refusal to issue travel passports after EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49913
BURZA v. Poland
BURZA v. Poland POL 18/10/2018 00:00:00 30/10/2018 16:53:51 Case Description: Excessive length of detention on remand between 2010 and 2016 due to extensions that were not justified by sufficient grounds Article 5 3 . Status of Execution: Updated action EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50673
D.M.D. v. Romania
D.M.D. v. Romania ROU 03/01/2018 00:00:00 15/10/2018 13:01:15 Case Description: The case concerns the excessive length and serious deficiencies in the judicial proceedings conducted between 2004 and 2012 on allegations of domestic violence by a father EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48703
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 11/04/2022 00:00:00 28/04/2022 15:31:34 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret surveillance system and the absence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60163
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/06/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: These cases concern disproportionate and unjustified interferences with the applicants right to respect for their private lives due to the indefinite retention of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55601
GAZSO v. Hungary
GAZSO v. Hungary HUN 16/10/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the excessive length of judicial proceedings in civil criminal and administrative matters and the lack of an effective remedy in this respect EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10875
GOMI v. Turkey
GOMI v. Turkey TUR 24/06/2019 00:00:00 17/07/2019 15:36:28 Case Description: This case concerns failure of the authorities to place the applicant who had been sentenced to aggravated life imprisonment and suffering from a psychotic illness since 2003 in a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52507
GUBACSI v. Hungary
GUBACSI v. Hungary HUN 28/09/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group of cases concerns ill treatment between 2000 and 2016 by law enforcement officers during the applicants arrest transfer and detention and lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10515
IGNATOV v. Ukraine
IGNATOV v. Ukraine UKR 15/03/2017 00:00:00 31/03/2017 16:56:44 Case Description: The cases of the Ignatov group concern structural problems relating to arrest and pre trial detention. They concern certain deficiencies in the legislation in particular the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46503
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary HUN 17/04/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group of cases concerns inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to the applicants poor conditions of detention both pre trial and post conviction resulting EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10809
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
KHAN v. France
KHAN v. France FRA 28/05/2019 00:00:00 12/06/2019 17:29:15 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment of the applicant a 12 year old unaccompanied minor UM in transit to the United Kingdom resulting from the authorities failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52223
KIM v. Russia
KIM v. Russia RUS 17/10/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns different violations related to the detention of stateless or foreign national applicants between 2010 and 2020 pending administrative removal from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14160
KOSTIC v. Serbia
KOSTIC v. Serbia SRB 25/02/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 14:45:07 Case Description: The majority of these cases concerns violations of the applicants rights to access to a court where: i the authorities since 1996 failed to enforce or enforced with significant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8635
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213